Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/June-2009
Valued Picture Tools |
---|
Please cut and paste new entries to the bottom of this page, creating a new monthly archive (by closing date) when necessary.
- For promoted entries, add {{VPCresult|Promoted|File:FILENAME.JPG}} to the bottom of the entry, replacing FILENAME.JPG with the file that was promoted.
- For entries not promoted, add {{VPCresult|Not promoted| }} to the bottom of the entry.
- Do NOT put any other information inside the template. It should be copied and pasted exactly, and only the first one should have FILENAME.JPG replaced with the actual filename.
Archives | |
2009: | January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December |
2010: | January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December |
- Reason
- It seems to be a bit quiet round here at the moment so I thought I'd liven things up. The photo clearly shows the counter-rotating propellors and swept-back wings that are a characteristic of this aeroplane. The refuelling probe on the nose is also shown well. I would have nominated this for FP but the resolution's a bit low.
- Articles this image appears in
- Tupolev Tu-95, (Russian Air Force)
- Creator
- Sergey Krivchikov - Russian AviaPhoto Team
- Support as nominator --Time3000 (talk) 11:10, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support per nominator. --candle•wicke 11:59, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support great demonstration for Russian Air Force. ZooFari 22:09, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 08:07, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support - Agreed, nicely done. –Juliancolton | Talk 04:47, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support--Mbz1 (talk) 02:49, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Promoted File:Tupolev Tu-95 in flight.jpg --wadester16 04:45, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Childe Harold's Pilgrimage (Dugdale edition)
edit- Reason
- It's very useful to have a good-quality title page from a first or early edition in articles about books (and poems). While not the first edition, this is still quite early - 1825, seven years after the poem was completed - and the rather nice engraving adds a bit of wow to it.
- Articles this image appears in
- Childe Harold's Pilgrimage, George Gordon Byron, 6th Baron Byron
- Creator
- I. H. Jones
- Support as nominator --Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 08:06, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Renominated now that one month has passed. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 08:06, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support Can't spot any obvious flaws. Noodle snacks (talk) 09:39, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support EV not bad... ZooFari 14:12, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support--Mbz1 (talk) 02:48, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support: Good EV. Maedin\talk 16:56, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Promoted File:Lord Byron - Childe_Harold's Pilgimage_-_Dugdale_edition.jpg --wadester16 16:41, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Reason
- High encyclopedic value, reasonable technical quality
- Articles this image appears in
- Hudson River, used as a minor part of about 100 others
- Creator
- Rolfmueller
- Support as nominator --–Juliancolton | Talk 04:46, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Comment I can't see it in Hudson River... Noodle snacks (talk) 09:34, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Fixed. It was an issue with the infobox. –Juliancolton | Talk 14:47, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Ewww, infobox image and millions of other articles. Strong support. ZooFari 03:00, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support Noodle snacks (talk) 03:16, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support, agree. --candle•wicke 21:54, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support--Mbz1 (talk) 01:51, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Promoted File:Hudson river from bear mountain bridge.jpg --wadester16 16:42, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Reason
- Meets the criteria as far as I can tell
- Articles this image appears in
- Jackson Creek (Sprout Creek)
- Creator
- Juliancolton
- Support as nominator --–Juliancolton | Talk 04:52, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Comment I'm not really sure that the subject is notable enough to be honest. The article is a one line stub. I'd like to see notability better established before promotion. Noodle snacks (talk) 09:38, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- As far as I know, images don't have to be "notable". Sorry, but is there something I'm missing here? –Juliancolton | Talk 14:46, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Refering to WP:NOTE mostly. Can you expand the article a bit? Noodle snacks (talk) 03:17, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- I personally think that's irrelevant to the photograph itself, but sure; I'll get on that tomorrow. –Juliancolton | Talk 03:44, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Personally, I like to see an image used in more than 2 articles, being the lead in at least one. That implies "value" to me. wadester16 02:06, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Can you coordinate it? ZooFari 19:54, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Not promoted --wadester16 16:44, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Reason
- Variety of plants at different sizes. The tallest specimens in the shot are about 5m high. Only commons shot of the species and genus as far as I know.
- Articles this image appears in
- Richea pandanifolia, Richea
- Creator
- Noodle snacks
- Support as nominator --Noodle snacks (talk) 09:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support taxobox+2articles= good EV. ZooFari 14:14, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support--Mbz1 (talk) 02:47, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support--MandalaWill (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:58, 3 June 2009 (UTC).
- Support. --candle•wicke 21:56, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Promoted File:Richea pandanifolia.jpg --wadester16 16:42, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Articles this image appears in
- Kistvaen;Dartmoor kistvaens
- Reason
- Great EV and very good quality, already VI at commons as the most valued image on the subject.
- Creator
- the Herbythyme
- Support as nominator --Mbz1 (talk) 02:39, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support good angle choice :-) ZooFari 20:19, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support, per above. --candle•wicke 21:58, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- support - Illustrates a topic very well. - Damërung ...ÏìíÏ..._ΞΞΞ_ . -- 22:54, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support Per nom. Sophus Bie (talk) 10:40, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Promoted File:Drizzlecombe kist 5.JPG --wadester16 16:43, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Reason
- Valuable image, used in many articles.
- Articles this image appears in
- Leonard Siffleet and others
- Creator
- Not known
- Support as nominator --Muhammad(talk) 15:12, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support per nominator.--Mbz1 (talk) 01:50, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support, agree with nominator. --candle•wicke 21:55, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support Great historical value. Sophus Bie (talk) 10:40, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support yep, EV is definitely there. ZooFari 17:13, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Promoted File:Beheading of Leonard George Siffleet.jpg --wadester16 16:43, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Reason
- This diagram provides a demonstration of the fact that your eyes must move rapidly during reading since you can only read a word or two at each eye stop. The upper line allows a reader try it out for him/herself, and the lower line is a good representation of the loss of acuity over distance.
I came across this image about a month ago, and upon seeing that there is such a thing as valued images, I remembered this picture. I cannot think of another image I have encountered on Wikipedia that contributes as much to its article as this one does to eye movement in language reading. I thought of nominating that article as a GA, but then realized that the article could use a bit of work; its this picture that makes the article seem so good. - Articles this image appears in
- Eye movement in language reading , Reading (process)
- Creator
- Hans-Werner34
- Support as nominator --TachyonJack (talk) 15:48, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support . The encyclopedic value is considerably good. - Damërung ...ÏìíÏ..._ΞΞΞ_ . -- 22:54, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Conditional support I'd like to see a vector version, one without having the words obscured by the diagram. ZooFari 22:56, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Comment I can see the EV of this diagram in printed form. However, there are a wide variety of different pixel pitches and viewing distances present. There really isn't any information about the dot pitch or anything required for accurate viewing. Noodle snacks (talk) 23:37, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support, encyclopedically valuable. --candle•wicke 21:51, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support Spiral5800 (talk) 08:08, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support Good EV, and furthermore, both mentally and visually interesting. Sophus Bie (talk) 10:38, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Promoted File:EyeFixationsReading.gif --wadester16 16:43, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality image with big EV. The town and Nantes-Brest canal have a very long and interesting history that add to EV. The image is VI at Commons
- Articles this image appears in
- Châteauneuf-du-Faou
- Creator
- Herbythyme
- Support as nominator --Mbz1 (talk) 01:45, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support per nom. ZooFari 01:52, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support per nom. --candle•wicke 21:47, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Not promoted No quorum. --wadester16 16:44, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality lead image of the 17th President of the United States.
- Articles this image appears in
- File:Andrew_Johnson_-_3a53290u.png#filelinks
- Creator
- Mathew Brady, touchup/cleanup by Jaakobou
- Support as nominator --JaakobouChalk Talk 13:25, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- Strong support Amazing EV! Good thing about actually linking to the file links instead of listing them :-) ZooFari 17:12, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support, per ZooFari.--ragesoss (talk) 01:12, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
Not promoted No quorum. --wadester16 04:46, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- Reason
- It's the best image we have showing what blackberries typically look like, and includes the full range from unripe to ripe
- Articles this image appears in
- Blackberry, Ripening
- Creator
- Ragesoss
- Support as nominator --ragesoss (talk) 01:29, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support - Great picture, ridiculous resolution, nice illustration of ripening. I wonder if the caption should note that it is the green which are ripe, the pink which are ripening, and the black which are ripe. Maybe that is too obvious since they are called blackberries... I'm not sure. -- TachyonJack (talk) 04:08, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, and good idea. It is a good illustration of ripening, to which I've just added it.--ragesoss (talk) 05:09, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support - Very good graphic explanation of a too specific topic. - Damërung ...ÏìíÏ..._Ξ_ . -- 23:30, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support - very nice. JaakobouChalk Talk 09:41, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Perfect image for describing this. --candle•wicke 01:52, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Promoted File:Ripe, ripening, and green blackberries.jpg --wadester16 04:49, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- Reason
- It's a fascinating frontispiece full of interesting details, and it's a point of connection for art, science, literature, gender, nationalism, and other big, important topics. The scan quality falls just a little short of Featured Picture standards, but it's still quite good.
- Articles this image appears in
- Émilie du Châtelet, Voltaire, Passionate Minds
- Creator
- From Voltaire's book; L. F. Duboury and I. Felkema? are the artist/engraver pair; scanned by the University of Oklahoma Library; minor editing by Ragesoss
- Support as nominator --ragesoss (talk) 01:44, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support Noodle snacks (talk) 03:53, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support. --candle•wicke 01:57, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Not promoted No quorum. --wadester16 04:46, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- Reason
- It's well-composed illustration of a fairly significant protest, showing both the large crowd and the Capitol in the distance, with many legible signs, outfits and props. Incidentally, it's also used as the cover of a recent Cambridge University Press book, Speech Out of Doors.
- Articles this image appears in
- Protests against the Iraq War, September 15, 2007 anti-war protest, Pennsylvania Avenue
- Creator
- Ragesoss
- Support as nominator --ragesoss (talk) 01:59, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Comment needs a little more EV for VP. The image itself is great, and good that the signs are readable, but it needs some more EV in description. Maybe improve captions and/or find another relevant article? The captions within the file page should be more descriptive, telling us exactly what's happen without having to go to the article. ZooFari 02:11, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- I've expanded the description and added the image to Pennsylvania Avenue.--ragesoss (talk) 02:32, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Great, but I think the caption in this thumbnail better describes the event. Can that be used instead (or merge it into the current one)? ZooFari 03:01, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- If you mean on the description page, I think it's now the same caption; I had used the wrong formatting for linking Wikipedia articles, so the linked text was all omitted. Fixed now.--ragesoss (talk) 03:55, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Great. Just one more thing, are you able to coordinate the image? If so, it will fill my EV critique to support.
- Done. I should've done that earlier.--ragesoss (talk) 04:23, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Great. Just one more thing, are you able to coordinate the image? If so, it will fill my EV critique to support.
- If you mean on the description page, I think it's now the same caption; I had used the wrong formatting for linking Wikipedia articles, so the linked text was all omitted. Fixed now.--ragesoss (talk) 03:55, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Great, but I think the caption in this thumbnail better describes the event. Can that be used instead (or merge it into the current one)? ZooFari 03:01, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- I've expanded the description and added the image to Pennsylvania Avenue.--ragesoss (talk) 02:32, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support meets my EV criteria to support. It is also an honor to have it as a front cover :-) Did you check if they, you know, released it with your desired license? ZooFari 04:36, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- No, the author contacted me directly and asked for permission to use it; at my request, he tried to get Cambridge University Press to include a CC license for the cover, but they wouldn't and I let them use it anyway. For other types of publications I wouldn't do that without payment, but for academic books the authors (who rarely make any money off the books) often have to secure all the image rights themselves. So all I got was a copy of the book. --ragesoss (talk) 05:05, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Well it's still an honor and very generous of you :-) ZooFari 05:08, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- No, the author contacted me directly and asked for permission to use it; at my request, he tried to get Cambridge University Press to include a CC license for the cover, but they wouldn't and I let them use it anyway. For other types of publications I wouldn't do that without payment, but for academic books the authors (who rarely make any money off the books) often have to secure all the image rights themselves. So all I got was a copy of the book. --ragesoss (talk) 05:05, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- SupportNoodle snacks (talk) 04:45, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Not promoted No quorum. --wadester16 04:46, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- Reason
- Highly informative, I got the gist of what a bubble sort is just by looking at this image.
- Articles this image appears in
- Bubble sort, Comparison sort, Sorting algorithm
- Creator
- User:Nmnogueira
- Support as nominator --Cacophony (talk) 18:27, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Do you think you can do the following?
- Place image in 2 more relevant articles (not in galleries).
- Update the description in the file page, perhaps using a more descriptive caption like the one in this one.
- If you can do so, it will fill the needs for my EV evaluation to support. Other than that, it is a pretty good image. ZooFari 23:39, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
- Probably not. The subject is limited to a very specific concept. I don't think that makes it any less valuable to the article that it illustrates though. We will have to agree to disagree about your VP criteria. I think an image that does a really good job of illustrating one concept/article is at least as valuable as one that is just used in a bunch of galleries and navigation templates. Cacophony (talk) 00:22, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
- It's not just about value, it is EV as well. In that case, all images would be valuable to their article. But don't worry none, you don't have to follow my evaluation. ZooFari 00:38, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
- I was easily able to add it to Comparison sort and Sorting algorithm. Still meets the criteria, as it's been in its home article for more than a month. wadester16 14:18, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
- Probably not. The subject is limited to a very specific concept. I don't think that makes it any less valuable to the article that it illustrates though. We will have to agree to disagree about your VP criteria. I think an image that does a really good job of illustrating one concept/article is at least as valuable as one that is just used in a bunch of galleries and navigation templates. Cacophony (talk) 00:22, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support. It's an excellent complement to the text explanation in bubble sort.--ragesoss (talk) 01:40, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support - Excellent graphic demostration. - Damërung ...ÏìíÏ..._Ξ_ . -- 23:29, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support I think the ideal animation is one that executes a number of algorithms simultaneously on the same data set. Be huge as a gif though. Noodle snacks (talk) 04:06, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Promoted File:Bubble sort animation.gif --wadester16 04:49, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- Reason
- Fairly low resolution, but big enough to get the point across.
- Articles this image appears in
- Eric Mazur, Subwavelength-diameter optical fibre
- Creator
- Noodle snacks
- Support as nominator --Noodle snacks (talk) 01:19, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
ConditionalWeak support, simply because it's so small. It should be moved to Commons (that's the "conditional" part of my vote).--ragesoss (talk) 01:30, 17 June 2009 (UTC)- Done It is now at Commons. wadester16 06:25, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Not promoted No quorum. --wadester16 04:46, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Archives | |
2009: | January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December |
2010: | January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December |