Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 November 6

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Normally a template with this magnitude of transclusions would merit more discussion, but I see no reason why a now-historical project would need an empty template to track, well, seemingly nothing. If there is serious concern that this was deleted "too hastily" I will relist this discussion for further debate. Note that this template was only transcluded on about 60 templates, so the article-space transclusions are double-transcluded and will clear when the job queue catches up to it. Primefac (talk) 00:56, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Listing this here instead of MfD since it's template protected and has almost 6k transclusions. It has no content and it's only possible usage seems to be the what links here list. Looks completely redundant to Category:Switzerland stubs. --Trialpears (talk) 21:20, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 November 15. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 21:30, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Spoken Wikipedia. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:43, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Spoken Wikipedia-2 with Template:Spoken Wikipedia.
It is better to have one template which can support varying numbers of files rather than 5 templates that only can support one specific number. --Trialpears (talk) 12:38, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:39, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:No disclaimers in articlesJonesey95 (talk) 07:11, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:38, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant, duplicated from Template:Good article. 115.178.211.161 (talk) 07:32, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).