Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 October 7

< October 6	October 8 >

October 7

Template:Culture of Egypt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Life in Egypt. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:13, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Culture of Egypt (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:16, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete or redirect to Template:Life in Egypt Frietjes (talk) 15:48, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect to Template:Life in Egypt; I figure things like art, literature and architecture can be merged across to the template with relative ease and then have the page left as a redirect. Mr rnddude (talk) 16:34, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 22:20, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and Redirect to Template:Life in Egypt Sdslkd (talk) 23:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Administrator review

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep and mark as historical. Primefac (talk) 02:29, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Administrator review (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Editor review (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Both unused; administrator review and editor review are defunct Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:47, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the only use of this that I have seen, literally on my own talk page, was an improper use of the template. As Wikipedia:Administrator review is currently defunct, the template serves no purpose. Same with editor review, project defunct and template serves no purpose. Mr rnddude (talk) 09:46, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just because this repopped up on my watchlist, I want to point out that the editor review template has well over a hundred transclusions, so it's not unused. However, the only thing this template is encouraging is the creation of a user subpage that's not likely to ever get comments on it and especially not comments that couldn't be placed on the user talk page of the respective user. So, aside from being deprecated, it's just going to create more pointless empty pages. Mr rnddude (talk) 17:05, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 June 7#Template:Administrator review participants: SoWhy (talk · contribs) and Xeno (talk · contribs).
Pinging Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 June 15#Template:Administrator review participants: Frietjes (talk · contribs) and Philosopher (talk · contribs).
Cunard (talk) 07:36, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
move to a project subpage. Frietjes (talk) 14:08, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as they have historical value; warn nominator for forum shopping. This is the third discussion they've started within four months on the same template. –xeno^talk 16:52, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 22:16, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and mark historical. There is no burden imposed on editors by the templates' existence. If the nominator or closer wants to then they can move the templates to project space. Jc86035 (talk) 04:47, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and mark historical but remove from user pages as to not confuse newer editors of the process. Nihlus 18:58, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AddCSS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:06, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AddCSS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Blank and deprecated template made by indefinitely blocked user. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:47, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And wouldn't have worked in its pre-blanked version. Delete and then recreate when mw:Extension:TemplateStyles comes out. {{repeat|p|3}}ery (talk) 23:55, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm partially joking about the TemplateStyles part, but a template that does what this looks like it was trying to do would probably be useful in that case. {{repeat|p|3}}ery (talk) 23:57, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AFL team abb Collingwood Magpies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:06, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AFL team abb Collingwood Magpies (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Another orphaned template since 2008 that is not required at all and I don't see any foreseeable use of this template. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:29, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom – unused and unlikely to be used. Flickerd (talk) 10:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AFL club Collingwood Magpies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:06, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AFL club Collingwood Magpies (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Another orphaned template that is not required at all and I don't see any foreseeable use of this template. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:28, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom – unused and unlikely to be used. Flickerd (talk) 10:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AFL HAW

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 October 15#Template:AFL HAW. Steel1943 (talk) 04:07, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AFL HAW (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Another orphaned template which isn't required and I don't see any foreseeable use of this template. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:24, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I've seen this template used on several AFL box score templates. It follows the standard format with other teams in those box scores. South Nashua (talk) 00:48, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom – unused and unlikely to be used. Duplicate of {{AFL Haw}}, if worse comes to worse then just redirect to aforementioned template. Flickerd (talk) 10:48, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AFL FOOT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 October 15#Template:AFL FOOT. Steel1943 (talk) 04:04, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AFL FOOT (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Manchester and Milford Railway

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 16. Primefac (talk) 00:51, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Manchester_and_Milford_Railway (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MSCI Russia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 16. Primefac (talk) 00:50, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MSCI_Russia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Check quotation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 16. Primefac (talk) 00:50, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Check_quotation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).