Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 March 2
March 2
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 March 10. Primefac (talk) 03:10, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 03:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- Template:NCAA Division II National Football Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Two links... fails WP:EXISTING. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 22:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Not enough links....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:22, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 03:01, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Miles Beard (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Article in template space. Already present at Miles Beard, but likely to be deleted by AfD. ~ Rob13Talk 19:31, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:58, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as an improper use of template space. --Rob Sinden (talk) 11:33, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy delete A10. I know it's in templatespace, but it's an article. — Train2104 (t • c) 05:15, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- delete test edits. Frietjes (talk) 23:04, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by Edgar181 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:13, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Infookvir pisac, kompozitor i likovni promotor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Consists solely of a template loop. ~ Rob13Talk 19:29, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy delete I've tagged it for G2 — Train2104 (t • c) 15:21, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 03:01, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Clearly malformed. Editor now blocked. ~ Rob13Talk 19:26, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- speedy delete, clear test edits. Frietjes (talk) 23:04, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 03:01, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Navbox with one link. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:10, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 17:41, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 03:01, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Ranks and Insignia of NATO Air Forces/OF/Australia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Australia is not NATO and Non NATO page exists. Skjoldbro (talk) 16:31, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:44, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 03:00, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Not enough valid links to perform a useful navigation function. Rob Sinden (talk) 16:13, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- delete the articles are already well connected. Frietjes (talk) 23:03, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:59, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Seems to include only one page right now, and even that entry has been nominated for deletion. High school baseball coaches would not be notable except in pretty extraordinary circumstances. EricEnfermero (Talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:10, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. As a note to DanTD, if there is a concern that "precedent" is causing valid templates to be deleted, I suggest starting a discussion at the relevant WikiProjects to clarify if there are any specific types that should be kept. Primefac (talk) 03:25, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Better suited by a category. Also see past Valdosta precedent, since confirmed here, here, here, and here, here, and here, and here, and here, and here. Rschen7754 03:10, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete—per precedent and my previous votes on similar nominations. Imzadi 1979 → 04:39, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Per past precedent. Dough4872 14:03, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.--Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 23:00, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - Why is it that suddenly navboxes for specific types of roads are illegal? Not all navboxes are in the same boat as the Valdosta highways one. What's next?Will the one for auxiliary routes of specific routes be tagged for deletion? County road lists? Are other navboxes in other projects being prepared for deletion discussions? ---------User:DanTD (talk) 03:15, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- delete per precedent. Frietjes (talk) 23:03, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 March 10. Primefac (talk) 03:06, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Adele songs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Adele (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).