Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 June 5

June 5

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:20, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

With only two albums, a navbox such as this is unnecessary since it adds no navigational benefit for the articles in which it is or could be transcluded. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 22:44, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 12. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:20, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:28, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, redundant to {{prose}} Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 17:03, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:27, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, misuse of template space as a linkfarm. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 17:01, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:39, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All content redirected except for "Rico Suave" and "Mo' Ritmo", leaving this afoul of WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 16:43, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 12. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:31, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 12. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:36, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:36, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Overly wordy template from 2006. No longer needed since DPL bot (talk · contribs) warns of ambiguous links now. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 16:21, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment As creator, I haven't used it for years, and had forgotten it existed. If it's still used, it might be worth keeping, but I don't see any evidence of current use.
I note that when I created it, there was a comment on my talk that it was too verbose. I think that's right. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:22, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:11, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Only three entries, would fail WP:NENAN if used. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 16:16, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 12. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:35, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 12. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:35, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:35, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template for now-defunct Wikipedia:Featured Sounds. Since Featured Sounds is no longer active, this template is no longer needed. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 16:10, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:35, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template for a meetup that happened 5 years ago. No foreseeable use Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 16:10, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as T3 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 20:13, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ancient and unused. Talk page suggests that the page for which this was intended was never created. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 16:06, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete I created the template under my now defunct account. There was a few of us trying to get an article to GA status and we found it useful to take our extended discussions to a separate sub-page of the talk page. That was the idea of the template and it worked well. That was over 10 years ago and I am still waiting for an opportunity to use the template again. Unfortunately, pages with a bunch of keen editors working together are rare. Periglio (talk) 01:04, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:35, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, links to a nonexistant section. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 16:05, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 11:09, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hardcoded template that's too tiny to read. No clear use. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 16:03, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as creator. I've been thinking about making a new version with larger text for a long time, but I don't know when I'll get to it. It seems I will need to start all over anyway with the links, so we can delete this template for now. Mikael Häggström (talk) 01:51, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:34, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Overly vague and unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 16:02, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:34, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, all content is already on {{J. J. Abrams}} Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 15:54, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:11, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hardcoded navbox, unused and no need to exist. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 15:44, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:11, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The 3 people listed are not even mentioned in the article, which leaves just the Council itself , one loosely affiliated organization, & one redlink. DGG ( talk ) 09:17, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:22, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template is no longer transcluded in article space, after gnomes and bots at Wikipedia:Coordinates in infoboxes have converted over 16,000 articles that used it to use the standard |coordinates= parameter and {{coord}} template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:19, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete --- there were some transclusions in active testpages for various infoboxes, but I fixed those. The only transclusions now seem to be old test junk. Looks safe to delete. —hike395 (talk) 08:03, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete, we no longer need this one. Frietjes (talk) 13:09, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:10, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, WhoScored does not seem to meet WP:EL guidelines. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 04:42, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:10, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Urban mining redirects to recycling. Linked pages in this template have nothing to do with urban mining and are just random materials. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 04:32, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:32, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused stub template; any river stubs are subcategorized now. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 04:30, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:32, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, superceded by more specific templates. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 04:28, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - The purpose of this template is to identify an error and direct editors to a list of the correct templates in the event that this one, which used to be the default, is used. Without it, editors have to go searching for the right one to use. --AussieLegend () 10:25, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:10, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Was intended for the Star Wars articles but new templates have risen in its place. No foreseeable use. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 04:28, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 12. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:32, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:10, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hardcoded timeline, not needed since Camel (band) has a real timeline now. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 04:18, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:33, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no evidence that these criteria were ever enforced by the project. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 04:15, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Country abbreviation. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:14, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:CountryAbbr with Template:Country abbreviation.
Identical purpose. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
15:59, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yashovardhan (talk) 04:12, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:10, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Overly vague and unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 04:10, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused indeed (see "What links here" at the template page), and the content, inasmuch as it is useful, can be found at Suffering#See_also. So, I do not object to the template deletion. --Robert Daoust (talk) 16:27, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by GB fan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 12:09, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hardcoded text copied from an old draft of stallion. No foreseeable use. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 04:01, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@TenPoundHammer: Yes, this template is obsolete. I created this template to merge some redundant paragraphs by transclusion, but this is no longer necessary. Jarble (talk) 04:06, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 12. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:14, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:06, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Red links. Marvellous Spider-Man 03:57, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:06, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused chronology template. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:53, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:40, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, use unclear as this was the only edit by the user in question. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:50, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:05, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, would fail WP:NENAN even if used Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:48, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:05, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, not likely to be used. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:47, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:05, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and overly specific maintenance template. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:47, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:04, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, redundant to {{humor}} Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:47, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:03, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, would fail WP:NENAN even if used Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:42, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:03, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused external link template; also crosslinks to bengalese wikipedia for something we don't have an article on. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:42, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:03, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, would fail WP:NENAN even if used. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:41, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Four related articles (same developer), more projects in the works, and the two founders (or at least their lawsuit) are likely notable as well. The navbox lets readers easily reference other related titles, just as navboxes were designed to do. Not sure why they weren't in use, but they are now.   czar 04:22, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
? Respawn Entertainment, Titanfall, Titanfall 2, Titanfall: Frontline, plus the other potential articles I mentioned   czar 04:27, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:02, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:39, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 12. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:03, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:01, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. I presume this is for a type of learning institution, for which infoboxes already exist. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:28, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:01, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused infobox, redundant to {{Infobox video game character}} which is used on all Pokemon articles. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:25, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:01, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template, most likely a joke. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:23, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:56, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, redundant to {{PepsiCo}} Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:17, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus wrong venue Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:56, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused userbox, seems pointless to have a box that you constantly have to add to tell others you're currently on the project. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:14, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:55, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. {{South}} was deleted for the same reason. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:09, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:54, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and fails WP:NENAN anyway. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:06, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:54, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Not everything needs a navbox, I think this falls perfect within it. Prevan (talk) 02:03, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:54, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear template. Says "At the top of a newly formed article, to spare it from unncessary deletion tags", yet the template is blank so I have no idea how it is supposed to achieve this. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:48, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:48, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused album navbox. All content is already on {{David Bowie}} Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:46, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:48, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly redlinks and unused, clearly just a copypaste of the {{Harvard}} template with some links changed. Already has a proper template at {{Howard University}} Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:46, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:48, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox; would fail WP:NENAN even if used. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:41, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:47, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused link template to site that's user submitted. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:40, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:47, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ginormous navbox with no clear inclusion criteria, also unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:38, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:47, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, don't see a use. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:32, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 12. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:47, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:47, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Seems like a very obscure reference to a term that doesn't really come up here on the project all that much, nor does this seem like a taggable situation. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:29, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deleted by Plastikspork per prior TfD outcome. Frietjes (talk) 13:14, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sidebar, would fail WP:NENAN if used. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:28, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deleted by Kudpung per CSD G7. Frietjes (talk) 13:14, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused link to a fan wiki, not valid per WP:EL Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:27, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'd argue to keep it, but there's no point when editors silently depopulate templates years ago. Why bother anymore? I kind of wish I didn't spend so much time doing that, or even defending this very template. People just come along and just flat out remove stuff. Then again, spending that much time on the topic of Digimon is pretty damn retarded. I don't blame this TfD, I'm just ranting because I was bored. Wait, was Digimon the one about the little blue village people? Oh god, has it really been 10 years since I was actually active here? They're still doing XfD's like this? What the hell happened? Where's all the flying cars? Delete -- Ned Scott 02:44, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This is the type of external link that should be added on a case-by-case basis, not automated. (Fan wikis are rarely good external resources,,nevertheless this Wikia in particular.) Not used, so no processing needed.   czar 04:45, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 12. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:46, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 12. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:46, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:46, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Entirely redlinked and unused. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:20, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:45, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and deprecated, replaced by {{double-bassist-stub}} and {{bass-guitarist-stub}} Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:20, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Centralized discussion. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:44, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused disambiguation page in template space. None of these is specifically "announcements", so the disambiguation is invalid. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:17, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:43, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, situation seems very unlikely to come up Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:10, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deleted by CactusWriter per CSD G8. Frietjes (talk) 15:46, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Parent article recently deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Real Quality Wrestling. Nikki311 00:20, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).