Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 February 12

< February 11	February 13 >

February 12

Template:DPRK supreme leaders hymns

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Redlinks have been removed. NPASR if non-redlink reasons are given for this template's deletion. Primefac (talk) 19:51, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DPRK supreme leaders hymns (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Quite ... impressive, the spontaneous love of North Koreans for their noble leaders, to manifest itself in that many patriotic hymns. But I think that a navbox consisting of mostly red links is not very useful. This topic is better covered as a list article, if there are sources for all of these titles. Sandstein 23:06, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. If the navbox only consisted of the seven links that are currently blue, I doubt that you would have nominated it. We can just pare it down to them; a single section will suffice. Nyttend (talk) 00:22, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and remove redlinks. --Tom (LT) (talk) 21:55, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Performance art

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 March 6 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:04, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Performance art (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

People's Choice Awards templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 March 6 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:04, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:People's Choice Award for Favorite Actor in a New TV Series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:People's Choice Award for Favorite Actress in a New TV Series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:People's Choice Award for Favorite Cable Sci-Fi/Fantasy TV Show (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:People's Choice Award for Favorite Cable TV Actor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:People's Choice Award for Favorite Cable TV Actress (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:People's Choice Award for Favorite Cable TV Drama (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:People's Choice Award for Favorite Dramatic TV Actor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:People's Choice Award for Favorite Movie Actor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:People's Choice Award for Favorite Movie Actress (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:People's Choice Award for Favorite New TV Comedy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:People's Choice Award for Favorite New TV Drama (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:People's Choice Award for Favorite Sci-Fi/Fantasy TV Actor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:People's Choice Award for Favorite TV Drama Actress (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox fighter biography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox fighter biography (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is not a template Peter Rehse (talk) 21:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

speedy delete and possibly redirect to {{infobox martial artist}} as a helpful hint. Frietjes (talk) 15:51, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:University of Waterloo Stratford Campus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:12, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:University of Waterloo Stratford Campus (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

redundant, unused template Aloneinthewild (talk) 19:57, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, just use standard in-article linking. Frietjes (talk) 00:08, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unused. --Tom (LT) (talk) 21:56, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Utoronto Mississauga

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:10, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Utoronto Mississauga (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

redundant, only contains two links Aloneinthewild (talk) 19:55, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, just use standard in-article linking. Frietjes (talk) 00:08, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unnecessary - as per Frietjes. --Tom (LT) (talk) 21:56, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MiNP Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:10, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MiNP Records (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No navigation provided; consists entirely of red links. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:34, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete G8. Frietjes (talk) 00:08, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 01:15, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Tom (LT) (talk) 21:56, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ecuafutbol player

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:09, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ecuafutbol player (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Created 4 years ago but unused. current links to that website return HTTP 404. GZWDer (talk) 09:53, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Probably nobody would complain if we G8-speedied it, because it's dependent on a non-existent or deleted page. Nyttend (talk) 00:24, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unused. --Tom (LT) (talk) 21:56, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Parkways in Westchester County, New York

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:08, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Parkways in Westchester County, New York (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Better suited by a category. Also see past Valdosta precedent, since confirmed here, here, here, and here, here, and here, and here. Rs chen 7754 00:46, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—per precedent. Imzadi 1979 → 18:50, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete per precedent. Frietjes (talk) 15:52, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per precedent. Might as well add {{Parkways on Long Island}} and {{Parkways in New York City}} too. — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 16:36, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per past precedent. Dough4872 20:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).