Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 April 14

April 14

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete as uncontested. Izkala (talk) 16:43, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All unused. All redundant to {{Baltic Pipeline System-II full}} ~ RobTalk 21:23, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deleteIzkala (talk) 16:42, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and unlikely to be used. Navboxes that group based on geographical area rather than "nearby river" are more common and useful. ~ RobTalk 21:12, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete as uncontested. The author can ask for it to be refunded in their userspace. Izkala (talk) 15:11, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. ~ RobTalk 21:11, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete as uncontested. The author can ask for it to be refunded in their userspace. Izkala (talk) 15:10, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and duplicated by {{Amsterdam Metro route diagram}}. ~ RobTalk 21:10, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete as uncontested. Izkala (talk) 15:28, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All unused. Wikitables are in use in 2012–14 European Nations Cup First Division and 2012–14 European Nations Cup Second Division, which appear to be the articles these were intended for. ~ RobTalk 21:00, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. WP:REFUND applies. (non-admin closure) ~ RobTalk 20:39, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant with broader Template:Airports in India present. Missed to include it in similar earlier discussion at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2016_April_6#Template:Airports_in_Uttar_Pradesh. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:47, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).