Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 September 12

September 12

edit


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:21, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Theatrical Marvel Comics films (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Almost identical to Template:Marvel Comics films. TriiipleThreat (talk) 22:05, 12 September 2012 (UTC)}[reply]

Agree, it is identical except it bizarrely places an emphasis on the distributor/studio. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 22:14, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It is a slightly more specific, much less useful version of Template:Marvel Comics films. -Fandraltastic (talk) 15:36, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:23, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox locomotive service history auto (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused fork of template:Infobox locomotive. Frietjes (talk) 17:43, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete per author approval. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:15, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:OXPSortableTableRow (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:OXPListTableHeader (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

sandbox code which belongs in the sole transcluder's userspace. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:45, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because when I created it I did not intend for it to stay. SandJ-on-WP (talk) 20:47, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:10, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Totd-random-noborder (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

trivial fork of {{totd-random}} which is massively out of sync with the parent. Only used on two user pages. A noborder attribute could be trivially added to the original. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:38, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:10, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TerminaLink (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single-use data table. Substitute on the single transclusion. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:35, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:48, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Storm path (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Trivial image wrapper which only complicates the transclusion of a single image on an article. Simply calling the image directly results in simpler syntax, a quicker code path and less complexity for editors to learn. Substitute it on the existing transclusions. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:34, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, it makes things easier, why delete it, not everything needs top be deleted. YE Pacific Hurricane 15:49, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Y, unless it would be replaced by something simpler, yet similar. Zonafan39 (talk) 16:41, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, it is used (which, ironically, is how I learned of this TfD). Editors may call images bare at present without the need to delete this template. --Nouniquenames 16:42, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:45, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SOPA Defcon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused boilerplate which mistakes Wikipedia for a weather service. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:31, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, totally unnesscesary.Graham1973 (talk) 12:53, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was move to WP:Route diagram template/BSicon-hubs and WP:Route diagram template/BS-ÜWjunctions. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:13, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BS-ÜWjunctions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:BSicon-hubs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Data templates which appear to have been copied from de-WP. These are in the wrong namespace: if they are still desired they should be moved under Wikipedia:Route diagram template. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:24, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was move to Wikipedia:Route diagram template/BS-anleitungR Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:34, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BS-anleitungR (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused utility template presumably copied from de-WP and abandoned. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:23, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:28, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Algerians infobox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and broken. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:14, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:28, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Uw-protect (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:CHILDPROTECT, "Reports of editors engaging in [the use of Wikipedia to pursue or facilitate inappropriate adult–child relationships] should be made to the Arbitration Committee for further action, and should not be the subject of community discussions or requests for comment or consensus." Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 02:56, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but it would still be a useful template as a word of warning Marcus. Mr.Wikipediania (StalkTalk) 03:37, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, now merged with both wide image and panorama. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:25, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:RTL scroll (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I have asked for a parameter to be added to {{wide image}}, which will allow for a right to left scroll. once this is added, we won't need this template. Frietjes (talk) 00:05, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.