Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 August 7

< August 6	August 8 >

August 7

Template:User interested in Nazi Germany

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G3 by Drmies (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User interested in Nazi Germany (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Hardly used but extremely controversial template. The Banner _talk 22:09, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hi! I don't see any problem with this. it shows the interest to Nazi Germany article. I just finished discussion about it at admin noticeboard. you put template for deletion with your own views not by the policy.--Neogeolegend (talk) 22:22, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So I say oppose because this discussion made on a type of point of view of a user.--Neogeolegend (talk) 23:15, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused or highly controversial templates are regularly removed. The Banner _talk 22:36, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for its drama potential alone. Haven't we learned anything from the great userbox wheelwars back then? --Conti|✉ 22:32, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete deliberately ambiguous template showing the nazi flag as an end in itself, this should not be tolerated per WP:CIVIL --rtc (talk) 22:38, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Conti — Ched : ? 22:44, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - If it was modified to: "User interested in the historical period of Nazi Germany" and the German Eagle was used instead of the flag; then it should pass. The Nazi Germany period of history is a subject which is studied by many and thousands of books have been written on the subject (not to mention, many articles herein). Kierzek (talk) 23:06, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is the whole point of the user, as I understand it, that he specifically wants the nazi flag. That's the way I understand his user page, especially the exploding swastika comment. Someone already tried to change the icon of this template into a less offensive one (which BTW was not entirely unproblematic either, IMO, but at least an attempt into the right direction), which he instantly reverted.[1] --rtc (talk) 23:11, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There's no inherent right to edit Wikipedia, and, if you do edit Wikipedia, there's no inherent right to have a specific userbox on your user page. If the community objects to the box you want to display, then you're out of luck. Display of the Nazi flag is pertinent on articles about the subject (although I personally would prefer that it be removed from the navboxes on the subject), but its use elsewhere is inflammatory. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:33, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that the user is trying to be intentionally inflammatory. Viriditas (talk) 00:40, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No need for a category that identifies users as such - there's barely a valid reason for any userbox, let alone a possibly controversial cat. dangerous panda 23:45, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The flag would not harm anyone. This is a history finished 60 years ago and shows the interest for reading. If this flag is found anywhere in Wikipedia's article, there is no problem to be found at user page.--Neogeolegend (talk) 23:47, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - May wish to consider some of this user's other questionable creations such as Template:User admirs Nazi uniforms and Template:User respects Erwin Rommel. Tarc (talk) 23:49, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The user is being intentionally disruptive. This is far more than an "interest" or an "admiration"—the user is actively promoting the Nazi "lifestyle" which is incompatible with editing Wikipedia. Suggest deletion and indef. block. Viriditas (talk) 00:30, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; with extreme prejudice. There's a very good reason that Very divisive or offensive material not related to encyclopedia editing is not allowed, and this is a textbook example. This can't possibly serve any useful function writing an encyclopedia, but it sure has hell can cause a great deal of drama! — Coren ^(talk) 00:52, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Coren, why don't you speedily delete it? If you want to save drama, that's the way to do~~ For the first time in my admin career (I think) I am going to invoke IAR and remove this, as purely disruptive. Drmies (talk) 00:57, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I had not seen the "this user likes Rommel and Nazi uniforms" boxes: they are now gone as well. I will leave it to someone else to decide if this user should be blocked or not. I've done enough damage for one evening. Drmies (talk) 01:02, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
comment. I can't find anything in the policy for having a user opening a deletion request for a normal user box.--Neogeolegend (talk) 01:00, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't no the reason, but why you were so fast with closing the discussion. even you deleted the templates Template:User respects Erwin Rommel and Template:User admirs Nazi uniforms, they were not the main part of the deletion talks.--Neogeolegend (talk) 01:40, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PunkRockInfobox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:23, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PunkRockInfobox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

fork of template in parent article (unused). Frietjes (talk) 21:17, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:911ct/list

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:26, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:911ct/list (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

not used (not even template:911ct). could probably be speedy deleted per this discussion. Frietjes (talk) 20:52, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Mandi Topics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:26, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mandi Topics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused cut-and-paste copy of {{India topics}}. Frietjes (talk) 16:34, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Odranci

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:27, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Odranci (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This "navigation template" contains just one blue link. Redundant for now. Eleassar ^{my talk} 15:01, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:The Decalogue

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:28, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Decalogue (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template is reduntant, as all the links are included in the director's navbox at Template:Kieslowski. Rob Sinden (talk) 14:21, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Royal Wessex Rangers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:50, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Royal Wessex Rangers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Royal Wessex Rangers is the fictional British Army regiment featured in Spearhead (TV series). DH85868993 (talk) 12:10, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Buckshot06 (talk) 20:35, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. This seems to have been an attempt to create a walled garden type template. 10:11, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Royal Netherlands Navy cruisers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep, but convert to a different format. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:56, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Royal Netherlands Navy cruisers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. The individual ships listed in the template transclude more focussed templates, e.g. HNLMS De Zeven Provinciën (C802) trancludes {{De Zeven Provinciën class cruisers}}. List of cruisers of the Netherlands already contains the information in list format. DH85868993 (talk) 12:06, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Convert to a cruiser classes template, which also includes unique ships; ships with classes would then be removed. Note not all the ships in the template have other templates. -- 70.50.151.36 (talk) 12:52, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Convert per the above, to be placed on the cruiser class pages. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 17:26, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Rosewood railway line, Queensland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, after history merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:51, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rosewood railway line, Queensland (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Superseded by {{Ipswich railway line}} which also includes the Rosewood line. DH85868993 (talk) 11:56, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

comment although the attribution is not clear it would appear that this template was merged with {{Ipswich railway line}} with this edit. Therefore this template's edit history is needed for attribution under the Creative Commons license. Edgepedia (talk) 12:15, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support - It seems like some of the elements from this template could be added to {{Ipswich railway line}}, like the "showing distance from Central, ticket zone, and connecting or nearby bus services" line, or some of the existing notes. ---DanTD (talk) 14:02, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Roman Catholic Dioceses - United States

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:30, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Roman Catholic Dioceses - United States (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Incomplete. Content already exists (in list form) at List of the Catholic dioceses of the United States. DH85868993 (talk) 10:38, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I can't even figure out how or why one would use such a template. Reso lute 14:27, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Resolute TheStrike Σagle 04:02, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Romanian election templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:33, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Romanian Chamber of Deputies election, 1996 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Romanian House of Deputies election, 2000 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Romanian Senate election, 1996 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Romanian Senate election, 2000 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Romanian general election, 1937 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Romanian legislative election, 2004 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Romanian legislative election, constituency results (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. The content is already embedded in the relevant articles, e.g. the content of {{Romanian general election, 1937}} is embedded in Romanian general election, 1937. DH85868993 (talk) 10:24, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Show-head

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:33, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Show-head (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Show-head2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Show-tail (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox trickery that was created in 2009 and never deployed. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 07:40, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Tea map china province locator

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:47, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tea map china province locator (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. DH85868993 (talk) 07:35, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Tcclim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:47, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tcclim (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. DH85868993 (talk) 06:23, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Never used. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 12:45, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.