Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 October 10
| < October 9 | October 11 > |
|---|
October 10
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Procedural close -moved to WP:Stub types for deletion Grutness...wha? 22:36, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
This template is redundant due to the Dissolution of the Netherlands Antilles - the Netherland Antilles no longer exist, and thus there is no longer any possible application. Jan 1922 (talk) 14:00, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 16:32, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
This is my rationale to suggest for deletion.
She may be notable enough to have her own article since she is associated with two groups, but isn't a navbox for musicians who have established themselves on their own, like Cheryl Cole for example. Other issues includes the singles part are of her as a duet with her bandmate, another as a feature singer of a band and nothing as a solo career since it is totally non existent, so is that worth mentioning.
The television part consists of with her former group and another one which is a guest appearance with her group, neither on her own, except a reality TV series, but then isn't it a common practice for members of a band to appear in a reality TV show. As with X Factor series 7, there is nothing mentioned within the article about her, so does that count? For the rest, as with discography, a separate navbox exists for them.
My overall rationale is delete as this navbox is totally unnecessary, plus other navbox exists for that role, making this one totally unnecessary. Donnie Park (talk) 12:41, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Keep enough links which has to do with Frankie. --L.Geee 20:53, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- I would had not bothered with this nomination if Ms Sandford had a notable solo career, but she was only associated with being a member of two teeny bopper groups, apart from one as a featured artist. Most of that on the navbox would be more useful listed on her article than this unnecessary navbox. Answer this, what has she or the group got to do with X Factor, nothing according what I can find within its article, therefore that shouldn't be listed at all. As with Hollyoaks Later, her group only made an appearance as a guest performer, therefore is that eligible, not at all, why, we will be littered with navbox of groups listing guest appearances, plus guest appearing on a popular TV show is a common practice. Also remove her personal discography as her solo career is totally non-existent. Her single as a duet with her S Club partner would be more appropriate listed on those of S Club 8, which have already done so. The navbox of KiGH does not list Ms Sandford and yet the band is listed in hers even though this was only for one song. IMO, I don't see anything necessary with this navbox.
- In all, a navbox for the Saturdays and S Club 8 is sufficient and her's is not since she have never had a significant solo career. Donnie Park (talk) 19:01, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Frankie Sandford has not had a solo career yet, and, unless if she becomes independently notable by means of solo music career or otherwise, this template isn't necessary. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 21:55, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.