Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 December 1

December 1

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:23, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Traumahawk - HCD Palm Beach County (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used on one article, should be substituted and then deleted. WOSlinker (talk) 21:32, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. WOSlinker (talk) 18:38, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fb competition 2010-11 Relegation playoffs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Pointless! Mhiji (talk) 19:19, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep Separate. WOSlinker (talk) 18:20, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:—wrap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:–wrap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:—wrap with Template:–wrap. Duplicate. Mhiji (talk) 18:36, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But what's the point of having two templates that do the same job? Surely one should redirect to the other? Mhiji (talk) 14:28, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:27, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Specialist police units of the United Kingdom (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not used anywhere, refers to three completely different types of body and replicated by Template:Garda Síochána, Template:UK home nations police forces and Template:Specialist police units of Britain. ninety:one 17:29, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. SchuminWeb (Talk) 10:20, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Talkbackalien (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary template. Mhiji (talk) 17:12, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. WOSlinker (talk) 18:24, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rep (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Dem (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Srd (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Ind (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Ppl (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Prg (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Nrp (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Knn (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Fdl (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Drp (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Amp (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Whg (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Various unused templates. Mhiji (talk) 13:26, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Redirect Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:06, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Thankyou (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary template. Very few transclusions. Should be substituted and then redirected to {{Thank you}} to avoid confusion. Mhiji (talk) 13:13, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. SchuminWeb (Talk) 10:24, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Promotional Products Businesses (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not much navigation with only one or two links. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:58, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. SchuminWeb (Talk) 10:24, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Promotional Products (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not much navigation with only one or two links. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:58, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. SchuminWeb (Talk) 10:24, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Motorsport in 2011 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Usage of this template has never been clearly established in its 2009 & 2010 versions, neither has an inclusion criteria for what 2011 motorsport season articles can be included. Is poorly named (some categories listed are not international), has been subject of edit warring. Until such time as an inclusion criteria can be established (discussion currently underway at Template talk:Motorsport in 2010#"Previous Consensus"?. Doing this in an attempt to prevent further perpetuation of NPOV and edit warring. Falcadore (talk) 02:14, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. WOSlinker (talk) 18:36, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:KLFsg (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary template. Only 2 transclusions. Should be substituted then deleted. Mhiji (talk) 01:30, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:23, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Shannara character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary template. Mhiji (talk) 01:18, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:23, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Exalted City-States (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary template. Mhiji (talk) 00:35, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. As per G7 criteria. WOSlinker (talk) 18:42, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox SG rail museum (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unnecessary template. Mhiji (talk) 00:09, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.