Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 April 10
April 10
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:37, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Template:POVW (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Useless warning message. WOSlinker (talk) 23:19, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed. Delete. Peter 11:29, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Pretty darn pointless. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs/Vote! 03:52, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete I concur with the nominator and the above voters. Airplaneman ✈ 04:10, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:38, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Template:Nutrition tasks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused project to do page in template space. Hasn't been updated for 5 years and there are no links to it either. WOSlinker (talk) 23:11, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - orphaned, unmaintained. Airplaneman ✈ 04:11, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete as a test page Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:55, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
- Template:Nextsunday (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template doesn't show next Sunday. Only one fixed date. WOSlinker (talk) 23:02, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - it's a fixed date. Useless then. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 21:04, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete You have entered the twilight zone... (pointless) NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs/Vote! 03:52, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete as housekeeping - main article deleted, no other links on the navbox, unused and unusable. BencherliteTalk 13:08, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
Navbox for deleted band. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toutes Les Filles. WOSlinker (talk) 21:34, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete Polargeo (talk) 09:40, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
- Template:Derek Brough (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template about a subject of a previous deletion discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derek Brough. Clubmarx (talk) 20:40, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, part of a series of hoax entries. Hairhorn (talk) 21:01, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - The artist's article was deleted as a hoax, the album is up for CSD as a hoax. The template links to no information that can be linked to the artist (if they even exist). OlYellerTalktome 21:14, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- For the record, all of the author's other articles have been deleted as a hoax. See here, here, and here.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:55, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Template:Intercontinental Cup and FIFA Club World Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
It has previously been determined that the Intercontinental Cup and the FIFA Club World Cup are entirely separate competitions, whose statistics should not be presented as congruous. Each competition already has its own navbox (see Template:Intercontinental Cup (football) and Template:FIFA Club World Cup), and the articles recently created that imply a link between the two competitions are in the process of being deleted. – PeeJay 13:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. – PeeJay 13:20, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. History merge is unnecessary because the same editor also created the other page, so all contributions are already properly attributed. RL0919 (talk) 14:11, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Writing/Introduction (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Oddly named template that is not used. WOSlinker (talk) 12:31, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete as it is orphaned with no foreseen future use. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:09, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Note This was probably supposed to be moved to Portal:Writing/Introduction, but was left behind for some reason. One possible option is to perform a history merge, but I don't think that's critical here. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:19, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - orphaned, redundant to Portal:Writing/Introduction. Histmerge is fine with me, but this was created by the same user a day later than Portal:Writing/Introduction. Airplaneman ✈ 01:17, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Technology/
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete the "Where to start" page; history merge the "Categories" page. Unfortunately, the Categories page appears to have been subject to a cut-and-paste move by a different editor than the ones who contributed the material initially, so history merging is the appropriate way to preserve the contributions. RL0919 (talk) 14:30, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Technology/Categories (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Technology/Where to start (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Oddly named set of templates that are not used. WOSlinker (talk) 12:31, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete as it is orphaned with no foreseen future use. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:09, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Note These were probably supposed to be moved to Portal:Technology/Categories and Portal:Technology/Where to start, but were left behind for some reason. One possible option is to perform a history merge, but I don't think that's critical here. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:20, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - orphaned, superseded with Portal:Technology/Categories. Airplaneman ✈ 01:25, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/History/
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Unused. User:Woohookitty Disamming fool! 04:59, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
- Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/History/Categories (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/History/Did you know (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/History/Featured article (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/History/Featured picture (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/History/Things you can do (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Oddly named set of templates that are not used. WOSlinker (talk) 12:31, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete as it is orphaned with no foreseen future use. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:09, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Note These were probably supposed to be moved to Portal:History/Categories, Portal:History/Did you know, Portal:History/Featured article, Portal:History/Featured picture and Portal:History/Things you can do, but were left behind for some reason. One possible option is to perform a history merge, but I don't think that's critical here. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:25, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - orphaned, superseded. Airplaneman ✈ 01:26, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Geography/
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. No histmerge needed since Portal:Geography/Categories was started fresh without using the material from the old page. RL0919 (talk) 14:42, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Geography/Categories (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Geography/Where to start (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Oddly named set of templates that are not used. WOSlinker (talk) 12:31, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete as it is orphaned with no foreseen future use. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:09, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Note These were probably supposed to be moved to Portal:Geography/Categories and Portal:Geography/Where to start, but were left behind for some reason. One possible option is to perform a history merge, but I don't think that's critical here. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:25, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - orphaned, superseded. Airplaneman ✈ 01:26, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Culture/
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Unused. User:Woohookitty Disamming fool! 04:58, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
- Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Culture/Categories (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Culture/Did you know (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Culture/Featured article (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Culture/Featured picture (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Culture/Things you can do (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Culture/Where to start (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Culture/Wikiprojects (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Oddly named set of templates that are not used. WOSlinker (talk) 12:30, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete as it is orphaned with no foreseen future use. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:09, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Note These were probably supposed to be moved to Portal:Culture/Categories, Portal:Culture/Did you know, Portal:Culture/Featured article, Portal:Culture/Featured picture, Portal:Culture/Things you can do, Portal:Culture/Where to start, and Portal:Culture/Wikiprojects, but were left behind for some reason. One possible option is to perform a history merge, but I don't think that's critical here. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:25, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - orphaned, superseded. Airplaneman ✈ 01:26, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Art/
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Orphaned with no use User:Woohookitty Disamming fool! 04:57, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
- Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Art/Categories (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Art/Did you know (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Art/Featured article (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Art/Featured picture (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Art/Intro (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Art/Where to start (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Art/Wikiprojects (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Oddly named set of templates that are not used. WOSlinker (talk) 12:29, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete as it is orphaned with no foreseen future use. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:09, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Note These were probably supposed to be moved to Portal:Arts/Categories, Portal:Arts/Did you know, Portal:Arts/Featured article, Portal:Arts/Featured picture, Portal:Arts/Intro, Portal:Arts/Where to start, and Portal:Arts/Wikiprojects, but were left behind for some reason. One possible option is to perform a history merge, but I don't think that's critical here. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:25, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - orphaned, superseded. Airplaneman ✈ 01:27, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 14:41, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Unused project to do page in template space. Hasn't been updated for 3 years and there are no links to it either. WOSlinker (talk) 12:24, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 14:43, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Unused project to do page in template space. Hasn't been updated for 2 years and there are no links to it either. WOSlinker (talk) 12:23, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 14:36, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Template:Nsfw (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Violates WP:NODISCLAIMERS. This template is only used on a few pages anyway - most of them talk pages, and one article, Brent Corrigan. As the article makes clear, he's a gay porn actor, so I really don't think we need to warn people that his website may be 'not safe for work'. Robofish (talk) 12:22, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Under criterion T2, templates that are "unambiguous misrepresentations of established policy" can be speedily deleted. This explicitly includes "disclaimer templates intended to be used in articles." Intelligentsium 18:37, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Speedydelete per Intelligensium. I think WP:NODISCLAIMERS is a greatly flawed guideline, but so long as it is one this is in clear violation of it. —what a crazy random happenstance 12:37, 11 April 2010 (UTC)- Speedy delete per above (citing WP:NODISCLAIMERS and WP:CSD#T2). Airplaneman ✈ 19:03, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
SpeedyDelete per above. I went ahead and tagged it for T2. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs/Vote! 00:02, 13 April 2010 (UTC)- Most cases on non article pages it's still painfully clear, and a disclaimer is redundant. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs/Vote! 03:47, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
- Weak keep: I removed the speedy tag. While I agree that the template should definitely not be used in articles, I see potential for legitimate use in non-article space, as a notice for editors during discussions (for example, I arrived at this page after this template was used in an ANI discussion). Something to consider. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:16, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:36, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Depreciated and orphaned, replaced by Template:Nationality laws. Non-controversial delete. —what a crazy random happenstance 09:56, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 14:40, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned template. Don't really see the need here. Avicennasis @ 09:55, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete as orphaned and unnecessary. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:41, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:36, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
This is not a history section. All articles in this template are really lists of photographers by country. Clubmarx (talk) 03:21, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete at best it is box of lists of photographers. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:40, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.