Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Miscellaneous/2014 April 25
Miscellaneous desk | ||
---|---|---|
< April 24 | << Mar | April | May >> | April 26 > |
Welcome to the Wikipedia Miscellaneous Reference Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
April 25
editwiktionary
edithow do I create an entry to wiktionary? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.154.88.158 (talk) 00:54, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- For a new word (let's say "woobleblarf"), type it into the "Search" box, if there is no existing entry for it, it'll say "You may create the page "woobleblarf" on a blank page, request its creation or create it using the New Entry Creator!". Click on the words "create it" and follow the instructions you find there. 24.242.87.207 (talk) 05:47, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- ... and make sure that your word is more than just a protologism. It needs to meet Wiktionary's Criteria for inclusion. Dbfirs 06:20, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- On multiple-word entries, I found at wikt:WT:SOP:
- An expression is idiomatic if its full meaning cannot be easily derived from the meaning of its separate components. Non-idiomatic expressions are called sum-of-parts (SOP).
- For example, this is a door is not idiomatic, but shut up and red herring are.
- One particular example which gets quite a lot of views is wikt:no shit, Sherlock. Which passes the SOP test because the "Sherlock" part is always sarcastic. - ¡Ouch! (hurt me / more pain) 07:47, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- Dig deeper, Watson!--Jayron32 20:22, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- I just finished Christopher Moore's latest novel, which is based (mainly, among other things) on events and characters from Shakespeare's Merchant of Venice and Othello. One chapter is, of course, titled "No Shit, Shylock". Deor (talk) 01:21, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
- Dig deeper, Watson!--Jayron32 20:22, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- On multiple-word entries, I found at wikt:WT:SOP:
charges for interviews
editwhy do you wish too charge a new auther for an interview would this not be benifitual too your paper and show that your ahead off others and assist new wrighters — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.196.232.141 (talk • contribs)
- Wikipedia doesn't charge anyone for anything (and we're not a paper either). If someone has asked to to pay in order to write at Wikipedia, they're trying to defraud you. -- Finlay McWalterᚠTalk 23:23, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- It sounds as if you've come to the wrong place: you are wanting to talk to some newspaper or magazine, but this is Wikipedia, and we can't help you. I would suggest, however, that if you wish to be an author, you start using a spell-checker. --ColinFine (talk) 09:47, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
- English probably isn't their first language. StuRat (talk) 12:53, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
- Even more reason to use a spell checker - and perhaps a grammar checker as well. -- SGBailey (talk) 16:53, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
- Any lexicographical analysis wood cheaux its simply knot possible two have sew manny miss steaks unleash ewe porpoise fully wan't too. μηδείς (talk) 17:44, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
- It sound like it could be some kind of employment scam. Sjö (talk) 07:27, 27 April 2014 (UTC)