Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2009 November 20
Mathematics desk | ||
---|---|---|
< November 19 | << Oct | November | Dec >> | November 21 > |
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
November 20
editCounting system
editStuRat (talk) 18:27, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
What's the name of the common counting system where you draw 1-4 lines and then put a slash through the four lines when you get to 5 ? It looks something like this:
||||/ |||| ||| || | |||/ |||| ||| || | ||/|=5 ||||=4 |||=3 ||=2 |=1 |/|| |||| ||| || | /||| |||| ||| || | /|||| |||| ||| || |
StuRat (talk) 10:15, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. StuRat (talk) 18:25, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- Also five-barred gate, rather more specific than tally.→86.148.187.62 (talk) 21:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Investigation of an integral
editI'm working my way through some assorted questions, and stumbled across the following:
I'm afraid I can't really get anywhere with it, and when I finally succombed to Mathematica it told me it didn't converge between 0 and 3. Any suggestions for what I should try? --80.229.152.246 (talk) 22:24, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- Without knowing what level you're at, I can't guess what investigations you're supposed to carry out, but the value of the integral is fairly obviously +∞. Algebraist 22:31, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, I got that much, but didn't really get anything else apart from that. Also, how would you go about setting out a proof of that fact? As for my current level, just before undergraduate. --80.229.152.246 (talk) 23:07, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- I would prove it by noting that the function is clearly measurable, that the Lebesgue monotone convergence theorem implies that the integral you want is the limit of , and that the Fundamental theorem of calculus allows you to calculate those integrals and see that the limit is indeed plus infinity. That's not what I'd've written before I was an undergrad, though. Algebraist 23:14, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for that. While I agree that it's not exactly what a pre-undergrad would write, I'll still look into it. It's sure to be interesting, regardless. --80.229.152.246 (talk) 23:35, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- I would prove it by noting that the function is clearly measurable, that the Lebesgue monotone convergence theorem implies that the integral you want is the limit of , and that the Fundamental theorem of calculus allows you to calculate those integrals and see that the limit is indeed plus infinity. That's not what I'd've written before I was an undergrad, though. Algebraist 23:14, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, I got that much, but didn't really get anything else apart from that. Also, how would you go about setting out a proof of that fact? As for my current level, just before undergraduate. --80.229.152.246 (talk) 23:07, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Since as a pre-undergrad. you are likely to be more familiar with Riemann integral, rather than Lebesgue integral, here is a proof you can follow based on those ideas:
- Show that for any , (Hint: the integrand is positive)
- Observe that, .
Now by choosing h small enough, you can make the lower bound for the integral as large as you want. Hence the original integral evaluates to +∞. QED. Abecedare (talk)
- Also, if you can do simple linear changes of variable, you may observe that
- that also makes it clear that the integral diverges.--pma (talk) 05:07, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
- Or, even simplier, if you haven't any problem with a linear change of variable for an "improper Riemann integral", as it is the integral of 1/x2 over (0,1]:
- thus the only possible value of the LHS is . --pma (talk) 10:29, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for all the help. --80.229.152.246 (talk) 17:26, 21 November 2009 (UTC)