Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Entertainment/2017 September 26
Entertainment desk | ||
---|---|---|
< September 25 | << Aug | September | Oct >> | September 27 > |
Welcome to the Wikipedia Entertainment Reference Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
September 26
editWhat is the plot to Blade Runner 2049
editMy guess is that replicants are secretly reproducing babies. 110.22.20.252 (talk) 10:03, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
- The article has the basic premise. To learn more details, you'll have to watch it when it's released next week. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 12:15, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
- "Warner Bros. has managed to keep a majority of the movie’s plot under wraps out of fear of spoilers getting out to the public" [1] Alansplodge (talk) 11:15, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- "Commerce is our goal. More human than human is our motto". What could be more human than sexual reproduction? Why make when you can breed them like cattle. 110.22.20.252 (talk) 07:36, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
- After you've seen the movie next week, you could report back to us on what the answer is. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 12:41, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
- Unless it's vague and confusing. Then we'll have to wait for the director's cut. Could be a while. InedibleHulk (talk) 12:57, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
- Vague and confusing. That's the reason I never got past about 20 minutes into the original movie, even though my DVD is the director's cut. I guess I should give it another chance. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 06:09, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- Worth the effort in my view. The original cinema edit had a typical "Hollywood happy ending" tacked-on by the studio using leftover shots from Stanley Kubrick's The Shining (see Versions of Blade Runner). Alansplodge (talk) 10:00, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- Vague and confusing. That's the reason I never got past about 20 minutes into the original movie, even though my DVD is the director's cut. I guess I should give it another chance. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 06:09, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- Unless it's vague and confusing. Then we'll have to wait for the director's cut. Could be a while. InedibleHulk (talk) 12:57, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
- After you've seen the movie next week, you could report back to us on what the answer is. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 12:41, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
- "Commerce is our goal. More human than human is our motto". What could be more human than sexual reproduction? Why make when you can breed them like cattle. 110.22.20.252 (talk) 07:36, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
- "Warner Bros. has managed to keep a majority of the movie’s plot under wraps out of fear of spoilers getting out to the public" [1] Alansplodge (talk) 11:15, 27 September 2017 (UTC)