Wikipedia:Peer review/Profound Morality/archive1

Profound Morality

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because... GA attempt. Look for thinsg that dont make sense, bad prose, anything i got wrong or could write better etc etc etc. thanks

Thanks, Chchcheckit (talk) 18:48, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Z1720

Comments after a quick skim:

I think this is ready for a GAN. Suggest using the sources listed in the "Further reading" section as inline citations. Many of the sentences have multiple sources supporting the information. Is any of it so controversial that it needs that many sources to support it? If not, I suggest removing the lower-quality ones, or WP:CITEBUNDLE. Hope this helps. Z1720 (talk) 16:48, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

im just like that w references sorry. maybe it was a perspective issue, but ig its a matter of choosing the strongest one (reference)?? adjustments will be made for accuracy of text. thank you tho Chchcheckit (talk) 20:56, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many citations in a row affects readability. If you want to keep large number of citations in a row, I suggest WP:CITEBUNDLE. Z1720 (talk) 21:30, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

as we type/speak i am whittling citations down so point taken about readability. idk how to cite bundle but for smth like this it doesn't feel necessary. Chchcheckit (talk) 21:32, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

actually no this is a godsend with bundling nvm Chchcheckit (talk) 21:51, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]