Wikipedia:Peer review/Poppy Meadow/archive1

Poppy Meadow

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because…

Thanks, Mayhem Mario 20:49, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Per my nomination at FAC, the article may have plagiarism and mis-attribution, per an editors comments at FAC, and this is how I can get it up to FA level. Also a general sort out of the Reception section. This was brought up later here. Thanks, Mayhem Mario 20:49, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is the plagiarism and mis-attribution cleared up? Not much use in a review until it is, particularly the former. Allens (talk) 04:04, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think it is! I did some edits, checked the sources, etc. Mayhem Mario 15:56, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you describe the reason, not just the 3 points? Also, peer reviews are not complete, so just nom and nom until all's straightened out. ~~Ebe123~~ → report on my contribs. 22:50, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The image could use some alt text. Allens (talk) 23:55, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Ebe123, could you re-explain that? And

Done alt text! Mayhem Mario 17:35, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]