| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to turn it into a Good Article. I think that the article violates criteria 6b and 3b.
Thanks, Equalwidth (C) 07:12, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Not sure what the exact etiquette is here, but this should be removed. This editor is blocked, has made virtually no contributions to the article, and doesn't have the basic Wiki knowledge to understand the PR process or feedback yet. No peer review is necessary at this time. Sergecross73 msg me 14:32, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Sergecross73: The user is only blocked for a week, so this PR can probably stay open. If Equalwidth can address comments upon their return. If their block is extended, we can close this until their return. Z1720 (talk) 20:44, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- I know, I'm the one who blocked them. And the whole reason I blocked him is because he's a very new editor who keeps on making disruptive edits in more advanced areas that he doesn't understand. Bad AFD noms, giving bad advice at the TEAHOUSE, inappropriately warning other editors, etc. If you guys want to leave it up, so be it, I just know these things take time and effort, and I didn't want someone wasting time going through all the work for someone who wouldn't even know what to do with peer review feedback. He should be taking the WP:WIKIPEDIAADVENTURE, not taking advanced feedback from a peer review. Sergecross73 msg me 21:07, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- Equalwidth has since been indef blocked, FYI. Sergecross73 msg me 14:26, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- I know, I'm the one who blocked them. And the whole reason I blocked him is because he's a very new editor who keeps on making disruptive edits in more advanced areas that he doesn't understand. Bad AFD noms, giving bad advice at the TEAHOUSE, inappropriately warning other editors, etc. If you guys want to leave it up, so be it, I just know these things take time and effort, and I didn't want someone wasting time going through all the work for someone who wouldn't even know what to do with peer review feedback. He should be taking the WP:WIKIPEDIAADVENTURE, not taking advanced feedback from a peer review. Sergecross73 msg me 21:07, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Sergecross73: The user is only blocked for a week, so this PR can probably stay open. If Equalwidth can address comments upon their return. If their block is extended, we can close this until their return. Z1720 (talk) 20:44, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Closing PR, user has been indeffed. If another editor would like to open a new PR, they may do so. Z1720 (talk) 05:05, 2 January 2024 (UTC)