Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because of academic purposes.
Thanks, StefanieStrohl (talk) 20:48, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for your interest in this article, StefanieStrohl. Could you be more specific what you are hoping to achieve through this review? Some examples might be thoughts on direction, general quality concerns, preparation for GA status, sourcing, or opinions about particular issues. A more specific question may elicit more responses. LT90001 (talk) 12:32, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
- I'm afraid that PR requests from new users who don't appear to be actively engaged in the article they are submitting and for articles that are technically difficult subjects aren't going to get very far. ResMar 15:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)