Wikipedia:Peer review/Iron and Steel Industry in India/archive1

Iron and Steel Industry in India

I've listed this article for peer review because… I would like to clear the issues associated with the article

Thanks, Bismuth 123 (talk) 11:44, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

 Review What an interesting page, Bismuth 123! I quite like the overview of the history of steel and iron in India. Here are some thoughts from the review:

1. The article would benefit from the tables being included in written text, rather than a series of tables, which are difficult to read.
2. The first half of the article would benefit from more citations
3. The history section is really interesting
4. The article overall would benefit from more Wikilinks so that readers can go to articles about related areas (such as about the major steel companies and regions of India)
5. Most articles are titled in lowercase except for names, so this article should probably be titled Iron and steel industry in India.

Overall it's clear you've put a lot of effort into this article. Nice work. --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:52, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

 Review As Tom (LT) said, an interesting article indeed. I think a few things could be done for the benefit of the article.

1. Under exports, if such data is available, break down yearly export quantities as the import section does.
2. A picture in the lede would do well.
3. Although there is a bibliography, inline citations for the number-heavy portions would be good.
4. Some areas could use copy editing, so requesting that at Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors would go a long way.
5. I reiterate Tom (LT)'s #5

Quite an informative article overall. Ergo Sum 21:56, 20 January 2016 (UTC)