This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it was once a GA, but standards have changed since then and was recently delisted. It needs some work, particularly with sourcing, so let's take it one step at a time. Any suggestions you can provide would be helpful (where to look, any books you know of). Anything else you think this article needs to really help it shine, be bold and speak up.
Thanks, BOZ (talk) 15:07, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Archived due to the presence of a major cleanup banner. Brianboulton (talk) 23:09, 31 August 2009 (UTC)