| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to improve it! That includes the possibility that there is too much information...I would like feedback on what information is too in-depth and unneeded for the article, as well as anything that's unclear, or anything that's incorrectly done, etc etc.
Thanks, Sforzando (talk) 00:04, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Comments from Tezero
edit- Would you be able to find reception for the game? Famitsu is a well-known Japanese reviewer. Additionally, perhaps Western media outlets like IGN and GameSpot have offered opinions on the game, even if not full-fledged reviews.
- Also, the more third-party (i.e. not by Nintendo) sources you add, the less in-question the article's notability will be.
- The level-4 subsections in the article (e.g. "Flipnote Gallery: Friends") are a little too detailed. Those bullet points really aren't necessary, and I'd prefer if all of those subsections were merged into "Online services".
- Done. -Sforzando (talk) 22:39, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
- Three images may be a little much for fair use. I'd recommend removing either the second or third one, as they don't illustrate a whole lot about the app's features or general gameplay. (To put it in context, including the friends online would be like a Pokémon game article having a screenshot from the menus – apparently, even a screenshot of the overworld, a major and unique part of the game, is too much to ask, though.)
- Done. -Sforzando (talk) 22:39, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
- If you're trying to get the article to GA status, it may be ineligible while there are still plans for a Western release but it hasn't happened yet. That was how Pokémon Black and White failed its GAN, for example.
- Well shucks. -Sforzando (talk) 22:39, 15 April 2014 (UTC)