I have put in a lot of effort recently into improving this article's reliability, by introducing sources to unsourced claims, and other minor detail fixes that make a huge difference. I would like some feedback about how the article is written, what can be changed and what can be added to the article to promote it to FA. More references is probably an issue, but I'd like to hear more comments about the prose of the article, other wording issues, etc. Kind regards, Sebi [talk] 05:32, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR t 00:21, 15 September 2007 (UTC)