Wikipedia:Peer review/Anne Hathaway (actress)/archive1

Anne Hathaway (actress)

What should be done to make this article better? Crimson-Radar 16:17, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the lead paragraph is a bit biased... but the article overall is very well referenced and has good prosaic flow. For someone of her status and reputation, the article is completely sufficient, flattering even. Not much can be done in my opinion, minus the opener. Seegoon 17:08, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is there anything else that could be added to these sections? Crimson-Radar 17:49, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt it - a "trivia" section, maybe, of miscellaneous information? Seegoon 13:59, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've corrected the lead section. It's still not particularly interesting since there's a lack of references. I'd like this article to be of better quality, so if you have any suggestions, please offer them. Never Mystic 23:14, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify: Crimson-Radar was the nominator and I'd like to help out. Sorry for the confusion, if there was any. Never Mystic 00:04, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What is there is good, but here are a few suggestions to hopefully make it better. In the lead, try "...the sequel The Princess Diaries 2: Royal Engagement" (instead of The Princess Diaries sequel). Say what she studied / majored in in college (is this where she became a "top-ranking soprano"?). Clarify the chronology of her college and acting company careers - which came first? Did they overlap? The article says she prefers stage acting, but lists no stage roles. If at all possible give her major stage roles and quote some critical reviews of her stage work. Some of the preceding material may be hard to find, but there are lots of movie reviews out there - quote from them and look at what critics think of her film acting, how she does in comedy vs. drama, how she has changed / grown as an actor over time, etc. Ruhrfisch 15:02, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your suggestions! Never Mystic (t c) 22:03, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]