Wikipedia:Peer review/2000 Football League Second Division playoff final/archive1

2000 Football League Second Division playoff final

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for August 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I'm reasonably confident this article is of GA quality, but it's my first stab at doing an article on an individual match, so please let me know if I've lurched a bit too much into journalistic match report mode at any point :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:13, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coincidentally I've recently been working on a match article for the first time; Struway and I have been expanding 1956 FA Cup Final. I'm not sure what I'd consider as GA or FA quality for a match article yet, but we might gain pointers from looking at each other's work.
I don't see why the Football League website is linked in the infobox.
I'd imagine geography is a large reason for the disparity in fan numbers, if you can find a source for it.
but left out captain Carl Bradshaw and first-choice goalkeeper Roy Carroll, who had missed both semi-final matches following an appendix operation - makes it sound like they both had the appendix operation.
was described as "one of Wembley's great goals" - might be best to directly attribute the quote. Oldelpaso (talk) 14:42, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I've amended the points you mention, haven't found a source to confirm that geography led to such a small ticket update by Wigan fans. I only remember that they kept sending more and more of their allocation back, which got snapped up by Gills ~~fair-weather glory-hunters~~ fans :-)
  - Oh, and 2007 UEFA Champions League Final is already an FA, so that's something to compare against.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:19, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - BTW your article is much better than mine :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:23, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from Jameboy (talk · contribs)

For balance, should we also say what happened to Wigan in the season(s) following? :-) --Jameboy (talk) 22:40, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:13, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]