Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Loituma Girl/1
- Result: Delist. Geometry guy 21:11, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
This article fails:
- Criteria 1: much of the Commercialization section is about the song, not the animation
- Criteria 2: many facts are unsourced
For these reasons, I believe this article should be delisted. --Jedravent (talk) 15:51, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Perhaps it should all just be merged into Ievan Polkka?--SeizureDog (talk) 13:20, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- No, it's survived a deletion attempt. But it does not seem to be of GA quality. --Jedravent (talk) 00:45, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- The AfD was no consensus, so you could still try merging, as long as you leave a redirect. Geometry guy 12:56, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- No, it's survived a deletion attempt. But it does not seem to be of GA quality. --Jedravent (talk) 00:45, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delist. The article's lead is deficient as it doesn't summarize all of the article's main topics. However, I'm more concerned with the lack of citations. Majoreditor (talk) 13:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delist Inadequate lead, background section addressing “Ievan Polkka” and “Bleach anime” is needed for proper readability and article is under-sourced (numerous cite tags). Ɛƚƈơƅƅơƚɑ talk 23:17, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delist: per all the above. There are far too many citation needed tags, a copyedit is needed, I spotted a few MoS violations, and the focus, coverage and lead are problematic. EyeSereneTALK 12:00, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delist. I agree with the above, and don't have any further comments. Geometry guy 12:56, 3 February 2008 (UTC)