Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Cyborg Kuro-chan/1

< Wikipedia:Good article reassessment

Cyborg Kuro-chan

edit
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review
Result: Not Listed - This GAR was a quick-failed GAN. The GAR has been up for a month and the article clearly did not meet criteria 1a and 2. There were 4 votes to not list and none to list. One reviewer suggested holding off while a full review was finished, but there has been no activity or meaningful discussion in over 2 weeks. Aaron north (T/C) 02:18, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Completing nomination for community reassessment on behalf of the nominator who did not agree with my quick-fail. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:52, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to give it a longer review. The article has significantly improved since before the nominator was involved and the nominator clearly believed that I have done all that I can so far to improve this article. I think it is a good piece of work. Could you please review it, and if it is, please pass it. If it is not, what can I do to improve it? - since I added in the bones of an episode list he has been working on adding synopses. Because of this, I believe it is inappropriate to close this review prematurely. For clear English, romanised or translated episode titles should be provided, and the whole article needs a copyedit. The lead needs expanding, for writing about fiction, more reviews should be used in the reception section - the Planete BD reviews and the Manga-News.com reviews would be a good start. I've found that in general, watchership details of anime are difficult to come by. The fair use pictures have been reduced. --Malkinann (talk) 22:28, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Above comments suggest that peer review would be appropriate, not an extended review here, which I note the GAN nominator has not responded to. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:35, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Has the nominator been invited to comment here? He may not realise that he may. --Malkinann (talk) 19:08, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - User_talk:Railer-man#Your_GA_nomination_of_Cyborg_Kuro-chan - and he acknowledges that the article has failed GA, and is no longer contesting the fail. If you withdraw your objection then this GAR can be closed. I am now going to France and will have very limited internet access for 12 days, so I won't be closing it. SilkTork *YES! 06:10, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is no deadline - I'd like this article to recieve a longer review based on the GA criteria, not on the quick-fail criteria. The nomination was by someone new to the GA process, which according to WP:RGA should warrant a full review. The initial review and the reviews by Ucucha and Arsenikk above are out of date. --Malkinann (talk) 06:20, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • The character list could use a cast listing for the anime. --Malkinann (talk) 23:20, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Do Not List - The prose isn't great, but the article was very poorly cited. A quick-fail was not an unreasonable decision, but if we have a reviewer willing to give a full GA review, I guess I'm fine with keeping this GAR open for a week after the review is finished. I am skeptical that this will ultimately pass. Aaron north (T/C) 19:53, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Re-open reassessment: While it is hard to find sources for the current epidsode list, I am doing my best. Other Kuro-chan pages on Wikipedia in various languages feature info on episode dates and other character information. Railer-man (talk) 23:50, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Cyborg_Kuro-chan/1&oldid=1251615508"