Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Finger Lakes
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured portal candidate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the portal's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured portal candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The portal was promoted by OhanaUnited 02:57, 5 July 2009 [1].
Co-nomination: (Cirt and Mitchazenia). See archived peer review (notified relevant WikiProjects, but only got one comment, oh well). Stats: 15 selected articles, 10 selected biographies, 11 selected pictures, 14 selected lakes (the Finger Lakes), 13 selected attractions, 40 featured pictures, 37 additional selected pictures, 12 sets of rotating DYK hooks, and an automatically rotating In this month section. I believe the portal meets the standards for Featured Portal status. Cirt (talk) 15:38, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Notified: Talk:Finger Lakes, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Lakes, and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject New York. Cirt (talk) 20:23, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Support after review, needs some work with captions. feydey (talk) 11:52, 26 May 2009 (UTC) In summary: fails FPC 1a. The content is very remotely connected to the topic, having a bird's picture with the caption: "The Northern Mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos) is the only mockingbird commonly found in North America" used on the portal misses the the portal's core. Why 2 picture boxes? While well built it is not FP useful, to get FP it needs to focus on the core topics on the issue. feydey (talk) 10:22, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Responses from Cirt to Feydey (addressed) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
Comments by Shoemaker's Holiday (addressed) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Detailed review: Shoemaker's Holiday Going section-by-section:
On the whole: This is very close, but needs a little more work to pull it all together. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 19:11, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment on above Selected biography issues: Help from Shoemaker's Holiday (talk · contribs) addressing the points he raised about these entries he added to the portal would be most appreciated.
Cirt (talk) 19:48, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
Responses from Cirt to Feydey (addressed) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
- Comments by Jh12
- Due to the nature of this portal, I can understand using sub-GA articles but you're going to want to change the Instructions under Portal:Finger Lakes/Selected attraction, Portal:Finger Lakes/Selected article, and Portal:Finger Lakes/Selected biography to reflect that. For example the article under Portal:Finger Lakes/Selected article/8 is rated Start-class, Portal:Finger Lakes/Selected attraction/1 is rated Stub, and Portal:Finger Lakes/Selected biography/10 is B even though the Instructions say the articles listed are GA or FA. --Jh12 (talk) 08:01, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Response: Fixed. Cirt (talk) 08:08, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- All the articles you mention are pretty clear B's, and one's actually a GA. Are you sure you got the links right? Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 20:26, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- That is because I have fixed it, as I noted, above. :P Cirt (talk) 21:37, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- All the articles you mention are pretty clear B's, and one's actually a GA. Are you sure you got the links right? Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 20:26, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Response: Fixed. Cirt (talk) 08:08, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Like Shoemaker's comment above, I think the portal "Would benefit greatly from lengthier, more detailed captions." In particular, it could use expansion of the captions to further explain significance to the Finger Lakes region and/or something interesting about the selections. For example, Portal:Finger Lakes/Selected picture/21 says "A tower of 600 bowls on [sic?] glass at the Corning Museum of Glass." That doesn't seem very interesting to me; more compelling is that the article says the museum "is home to the world’s most comprehensive collection of glass" and that it's in "one of the most prominent glassmaking towns in America." --Jh12 (talk) 03:19, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Unfortunately, that info is not really sourced to secondary sources in the article, which is why we went with simply descriptive of the image itself, as opposed to the subject in the article. Cirt (talk) 03:47, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not going to oppose based on this aspect of the portal, but I still think it is something that can be worked on. If the more outstanding facts can't be sourced, the captions could include basic information such as location, population, or other context. Going back to Portal:Finger Lakes/Selected picture/21, it could read "A tower of 600 glass bowls at the Corning Museum of Glass. Founded in 1950 by Corning Glass Works (now Corning Incorporated), the museum is located in the Finger Lakes region of New York and houses a research library devoted to glass." I just think some of the captions are still weak compared to some of the recently promoted portals Portal:Peru/Selected picture, Portal:Brazil/Selected picture/Archives, and Portal:Japan/Selected picture --Jh12 (talk) 10:26, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, I fixed that one per your suggestion [5]. As for the others, as I said already, above, I believe that Shoemaker's Holiday (talk · contribs) had gone through and improved the captions on those, but I will go through and have another look. Cirt (talk) 10:35, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not going to oppose based on this aspect of the portal, but I still think it is something that can be worked on. If the more outstanding facts can't be sourced, the captions could include basic information such as location, population, or other context. Going back to Portal:Finger Lakes/Selected picture/21, it could read "A tower of 600 glass bowls at the Corning Museum of Glass. Founded in 1950 by Corning Glass Works (now Corning Incorporated), the museum is located in the Finger Lakes region of New York and houses a research library devoted to glass." I just think some of the captions are still weak compared to some of the recently promoted portals Portal:Peru/Selected picture, Portal:Brazil/Selected picture/Archives, and Portal:Japan/Selected picture --Jh12 (talk) 10:26, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Unfortunately, that info is not really sourced to secondary sources in the article, which is why we went with simply descriptive of the image itself, as opposed to the subject in the article. Cirt (talk) 03:47, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, looks good. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:36, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: Good job. I have a few minor suggestions that I'd like to see addressed. [sd] 15:50, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Introduction: The fourteen lakes located in the Finger Lakes region include: The word include suggests there are more lakes than the fourteen you list.
- Related Portals: Portals should be portals to follow the rules of capitalization you used in the rest of the portal.
- Things you can do: You use both WikiProject Lakes and Lakes WikiProject. I'd recommend using sticking to WikiProject Lakes, since you use that wording for another box.
- Topics: Is this section necessary? You list all of these articles in the introduction and again have the county names in the box for categories, which brings me to…
- Categories: Shouldn't this category also be there?
- In this month: e.g. June 2007 - Change the hyphens to en dashes (–), which the featured Germany portal use as well.
- Selected picture: Two of the pictures, namely Ithaca Falls and Glenora Wine Cellars, don't have articles, so I can't read more about them. I'd recommend either you or members of WikiProject New York to start articles on them.
- Everything addressed except for the last one, as I don't have the experience for those two. I will request them for you though :) - 3 1/2 years of Mitch32 16:10, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Great. Thanks, [sd] 19:16, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you to Mitchazenia (talk · contribs) for addressing those points. :) Cirt (talk) 21:02, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Great. Thanks, [sd] 19:16, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Everything addressed except for the last one, as I don't have the experience for those two. I will request them for you though :) - 3 1/2 years of Mitch32 16:10, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.