Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Sunsets
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
More sunset photos which for more variety to the current FPC's, crimson sunset.
- Support 'Dramatic Sunset'. Self Nom. --Fir0002 21:53, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Must regrettably oppose, as one criterion for FPs is that they accompany an article. None of these do. If you can find a way to get 'dramatic sunset' to fit with an article, I'd be glad to support it. Denni☯ 23:30, 2005 Mar 29 (UTC)
- I support the grasshead picture, and oppose the others. I think the grasshead one utilises silhouette quite effectively, while in the others, the black overwhelms the picture instead of making it look nice. Enochlau 09:22, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- I will have to oppose. The pics shows too much graininess and artefacts for me. Circeus 03:42, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
- Support dramatic or golden sunset. No artefacts on my end. Mgm|(talk) 09:08, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
Support dramatic (1) or grasshead (2).Junes 09:16, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Actually, on second thought, I have to oppose. In the case of the dramatic sunset because I think one picture per hill is enough, and in the case of the grasshead because it's hard to distinguish the ground from the clouds. Junes 13:33, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice, but there's already a very similar sunset image in the featured pictures section. I added it for easy comparison. Could it be that the currently featured sunset is even taken at the same hill as the dramatic sunset? I support the dramatic sunset if it replaces the current featured sunset. Janderk 16:59, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Yes this sunset is taken from the same position as the previous FP sunset --Fir0002 09:55, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Not promoted +4 / -3 -- Solipsist 16:53, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)