Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Grape Hyacinths
- Reason
- I took this picture and made changes to it, and I thought that the colours and the light really captured its full effect
- Articles this image appears in
- Grape hyacinth
- Creator
- Tellyaddict
- Support as nominator — Tellyaddict 12:42, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. Blurry, and unattractive background. Pstuart84 Talk 12:59, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose Too blurry. 8thstar 14:54, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose per above; nothing is in focus. -Phoenix 20:38, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Support Great focus/ not noticalby blurry. Very nice overall pic =-] --Penubag 08:21, 13 April 2007 (UTC)penubag
- Heck yes it's blurry. Did you forget to click on "Image in higher resolution" by any chance? -Phoenix 16:31, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I did. I think it's still pretty good-- Penubag 04:35, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Heck yes it's blurry. Did you forget to click on "Image in higher resolution" by any chance? -Phoenix 16:31, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor focus, composition. --Janke | Talk 10:02, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose Sometimes you can get great shots with a point-and-shoot, if you set it to 'highest quality' and get the lens to stop down a bit. I'm afraid this isn't one of those times; despite 8mp and nice flat lighting there are big jpeg artefacts and general softness due to being shot with a wide-open lens. Compositionally, that left-hand cluster would have to have been out of frame and/or the main cluster better isolated from the rest the rest before it was anywhere near WP:FP anyway. mikaultalk 14:14, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Not promoted MER-C 06:44, 17 April 2007 (UTC)