Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of ISS spacewalks/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was removed by User:Matthewedwards 23:54, 19 June 2008 [1].
I am nominating this page for removal because it has been tagged for a lack of citations since March (and doesn't appear to have any kind of main reference for the bulk of the list) and its lead is a sum total of one sentence. -- Scorpion0422 21:33, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support removal, fails the basic FL criteria concerning verifiability through referencing. The layout is also off putting and I'd believe it has a few MoS violations.Collectonian (talk) 00:25, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support removal Shame, I like the idea of this one.. :(
- Layout of WP:LS is strange with contents table to the right and lead image to the left, and does not adequately introduce the article
- Fails MOS on WP:BOLDTITLE,
- No references for any of the spacewalk, which considering there is a notes column, there should be
- No explanation of what the purple rowspans are supposed to mean (my guess is each different mission, but I'm not supposed to guess)
- Sections are oddly grouped; a 3 year period, a 1 year period, a 2 year period, and a 4 year period
- In short, it fails WP:WIAFL Cr. 1, 2, 4 and 6, as well as general MOS guidelines -- Matthewedwards (talk · contribs · count · email) 05:40, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support removal Too many MoS breaches like the bold link and the number "6" in the lead, odd layout, and too few references. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 22:23, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove due to lack of citations. LuciferMorgan (talk) 16:27, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove due to lack of citations. GreenJoe 00:34, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.