Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Indian national cricket captains/archive1
No longer a Featured List
This list was promoted way back in June. It is not a featured list for these reasons:
- References should have a date of access
- The list implies that there is no woman's youth/under-19/etc. team. Is this true?
- 47 of the 107 links in the list are red. That is 43.93 percent. That is too many red links, and are unequally distributed throughout the list.
- The name of the list should be bolded close to the beginning of the article.
- Although not strictly grounds for removal, it should have pictures.
Miss Michelle | Talk to Michelle 20:42, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
>> # The list implies that there is no woman's youth/under-19/etc. team. Is this true?
- There seems to be one according to [1] and [2] but they are insignificant and their matches hardly gets reported in the newspapers. Tintin 20:57, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
- I agree there are too many redlinks. What is the best solution to this? Should the list only include the men's captains? It seems a shame to throw away the research on the women's and youth captains though. Stephen Turner 15:43, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
- Replying to Michelle's nomination:
- Wikipedia:What is a featured list does not specifically mention the compulsory use of a 'date of access'.
- The name of the list should be bolded close to the beginning of the article: It's a minor issue and certainly can be rectified without listing it in FLRC.
- Red links are an issue, I hope it is rectified soon. =Nichalp «Talk»= 06:27, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
Reasons raised for removal:
- It is still not clear if there is a women's youth/under-19 team.
- There are still 47 red links.
Since no one has objected, and while not strictly votes for removal, there has been agreement on there being too many red links, and today is November 25, 2005, more than two weeks after the nomination on November 9, I am removing this from featured lists. Miss Michelle | Talk to Michelle 00:26, 25 November 2005 (UTC)