Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of LSU Tigers head football coaches/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 17:36, 19 February 2012 [1].
List of LSU Tigers head football coaches (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Patriarca12 (talk) 16:59, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because it incorporates all of the comments from the four previously FL promoted SEC coaches' lists (Alabama, Auburn, Tennessee and Arkansas). Hopefully I have caught most of the issues, but there is always something after a fresh set of eyes looks at it. Thanks to all who take the time to look at this as all comments to better the list are greatly appreciated! Patriarca12 (talk) 16:59, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comments quick ones I'm afraid...
- Not keen on the empty cells in the key.
- The empty cells are included as part of the {{List of College Football Program head coaches key}}. In previous revisions, the key looked like this. I feel the template works better in that it provides for more uniformity across other college football coaches' lists. However is consensus here is to utilize the previous format, I will be more than fine to change it back. Patriarca12 (talk) 23:25, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 11:24, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*Would have thought Bo Rein would deserve a mention in the lead.
The Rambling Man (talk) 19:14, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support – Other than the blank cells TRM notes above, I found no issues with the list. I'm sure an adequate compromise can be dreamed up, so I won't withhold my support. Giants2008 (Talk) 20:20, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from NapHit (talk) 22:51, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
Thanks for taking the time to look at this! Patriarca12 (talk) 22:42, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
Support NapHit (talk) 22:51, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. In my opinion this list fully meets the featured list criteria. My only suggestion is that you might want to use WebCite to archive your references to reduce the risk of them going dead. This is certainly not required for FL status, however. –Grondemar 02:13, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.