Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Governors of Kentucky
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: 12 days, 6 support, 0 oppose. Promote. --MarcK 02:01, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
| Current Opinion | User |
|---|---|
| Support | Crzycheetah |
| Support | Golbez |
| Support | Agamemnon2 |
| Support | Circeus |
| Support | HiB2Bornot2B |
Collaborative effort between myself and User:Golbez. Fully referenced and contains much useful information. Acdixon 14:30, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment- I don't think it's necessary to split up the notes. It's kind of confusing to see two different number 2 notes in the lead, then there is a third [2] note in the main list.
- You already have a link to Governor of Kentucky in the lead, so just get rid of the See also section.
- The "Kentucky was part of Virginia until 1792; see List of Governors of Virginia for this period." sentence can be moved to the lead and the Earlier governors section can be deleted.
- The Living former governors section needs expanding (add dates of birth) and mention an exact date(i.e. Living former governors as of July, 2007)
That's all for now.--Crzycheetah 19:52, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with all except for the splitting of the notes; it seems very ugly to not only have the footnotes for that one table way at the end of the article, but to have references mixed in with footnotes. This is a shortcoming of the wiki software. I'll try changing the numbers at the top. --Golbez 00:01, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, I've put in all the suggestions and re'numbered' the references to be letters instead. And in the meantime, I'll work on coding a patch for cite.php to allow for two classes of references. :P --Golbez 00:22, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Nicely done. I'd suggest to create stub article for the red links since some people hate to see red links on a featured content. --Crzycheetah 01:19, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Could you add a note to explain why there was no Lieutenant Governor after John Caldwell? --Crzycheetah 01:22, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Died in office. Perhaps minor notes to that regard should be added, but I think that information is more apt in a "List of Lieutenant Governors of Kentucky" article. --Golbez 02:23, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I just noticed that you have notes for all "none"'s except that one, so I think it needs to be added for consistency.--Crzycheetah 03:09, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Done; and in the meantime, I cleared out four lieutenant governors that I'm not convinced were actually lieutenant governors. Oy. --Golbez 08:17, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Does the list of living governors really need a date? I browsed around some other similar lists (living presidents, length of vice presidential terms, etc) and found no date disclaimer. --Golbez 15:13, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- That's actually my suggestion in case one day when one dies and no contributor remembers to take that name off this list, Wikipedia won't look too stupid. --Crzycheetah 17:59, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think it looks very encyclopedic myself, and I'm counting on members of WikiProject Kentucky (myself included) to update the list when such a major event occurs. That said, if consensus is to keep it, I'm not gonna bark. Acdixon 18:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Does the list of living governors really need a date? I browsed around some other similar lists (living presidents, length of vice presidential terms, etc) and found no date disclaimer. --Golbez 15:13, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Done; and in the meantime, I cleared out four lieutenant governors that I'm not convinced were actually lieutenant governors. Oy. --Golbez 08:17, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I just noticed that you have notes for all "none"'s except that one, so I think it needs to be added for consistency.--Crzycheetah 03:09, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Died in office. Perhaps minor notes to that regard should be added, but I think that information is more apt in a "List of Lieutenant Governors of Kentucky" article. --Golbez 02:23, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, I've put in all the suggestions and re'numbered' the references to be letters instead. And in the meantime, I'll work on coding a patch for cite.php to allow for two classes of references. :P --Golbez 00:22, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with all except for the splitting of the notes; it seems very ugly to not only have the footnotes for that one table way at the end of the article, but to have references mixed in with footnotes. This is a shortcoming of the wiki software. I'll try changing the numbers at the top. --Golbez 00:01, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I see you guys are giving exact dates, all I wanted was " as of July, 2007" and not something like "as of today's date". Please, read WP:AO for further info about this stuff.--Crzycheetah 18:34, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I wasn't aware of the "as of" policy. As such, I'm definitely fine with it either way. Acdixon 19:00, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support though since I was one of the two who worked heavily on it I dunno if that's entirely kosher :) --Golbez 11:00, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, an extremely solid list that provides value you couldn't get from anywhere else. --Agamemnon2 11:04, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Needs images per criterion 3. Also add some text in the "living governors" section. Otherwise looks pretty good to me. Circeus 16:56, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]- Has images. What text do you propose? --Golbez 20:19, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Did it myself. I'd like to see the images in the table, but if the result ends up looking like the Alabama table, I can see the issue.support Circeus 16:29, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Has images. What text do you propose? --Golbez 20:19, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Great work. The list is excellent. -- Steven Williamson (HiB2Bornot2B) - talk 20:31, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]