Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Celine Dion albums discography/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 17:38, 11 October 2010 [1].
Celine Dion albums discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): max24 (talk) 13:33, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets all of the FL criteria.
Resolved comment from Petergriffin9901 (talk) 19:37, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*Oppose until certain criteria are met. There is a huge break in timeline, you do not mention anything, except the names of "Unison" and "Celine Dion", and you don't even mention "Miracle", "One Heart" or "Taking Chances". This a Bias point of view, because your only giving notice to her accomplishments and successes. Why not mention all the other albums? The fact that they were commercial and critical disappointments does not make them exempt from mention.--PeterGriffin • Talk2Me 18:10, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support My issues were resolved.--PeterGriffin • Talk2Me 19:37, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved issues from –Chase (talk) 22:17, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*Comments:
Fix these issues and I'll gladly support. –Chase (talk) 20:37, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support –Chase (talk) 22:17, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment—no dab links, no dead external links. Ucucha 23:01, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comment from Ruslik (talk) 19:28, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*Comment. The leading section contains a lot of numbers of album copies sold. It would good if they were also added to the tables. Ruslik_Zero 14:32, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ruslik_Zero 18:31, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support. Ruslik_Zero 19:17, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 16:00, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Oppose - lead needs overhaul, serious English-speaking copyedit required. Serious reference problems. Surprised and disappointed that two contributors support this in its current state I'm afraid.
The Rambling Man (talk) 17:38, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.