Wikipedia:Featured article review/Arrested Development (TV series)/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 01:29, 9 October 2009 [1].
Review commentary
edit- Featured article candidates/Arrested Development (TV series)
- Featured article candidates/Arrested Development (TV series)/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: Brian0918, Arrested Development Taskforce
This article was promoted in 2005, and it doesn't look like it has had a review since. The most obvious problem with the article is its lack of citations throughout the "Themes" section (1c). I also have my doubts about how many non-free images are used (3). I believe many of them are unneeded and are unjustified. --TorsodogTalk 19:13, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Images need alt text as per WP:ALT. Eubulides (talk) 01:27, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:GOB on stage.jpg should definitely be removed; an image doesn't help readers understand that a particular song was used. The other images, except for the logo, appear decorative; they illustrate the text but don't aide in understanding it. Is the logo actually copyrighted? I know it's trademarked, but it's typeface and a pen-marking, could be ineligible. Jay32183 (talk) 03:08, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary
edit- Suggested FA criteria concern are citations, images. Also note the recent change to WP:WIAFA (1c) requiring "high-quality" sources. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 03:14, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - Per my review --TorsodogTalk 13:20, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, per FA criteria concerns. Cirt (talk) 20:59, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.