Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/R.O.B./archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted 03:01, 26 November 2007.

---

R.O.B.

R.O.B. -- I am very interested in Wikipedia, how can I make this become a featured article?—Preceding unsigned comment added by H.M.S. Goldfinger (talk • contribs)

• This page isn't for questions about featured articles- the talk page might be a better place. Read through What is a featured article? You should probably check out WP:NEWBIE too.-Wafulz (talk) 01:43, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose
• Lead section is too short.
• Article has only 1 reference.
• Do you need a list of "Appearances in Games"?
• If you are new I suggest you try GA first. Please read the FA criteria and the GA criteria before nominating an article for FA or GA. --Kaypoh (talk) 02:07, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose See the articles that have made FA at WP:FA too. This ROB one is barely more than a stub. Remove per WP:SNOW. — Rlevse • Talk • 20:35, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
• Objections A case study in FA Candidateship? It is at least "start" class I believe. Who gets to nominate articles and which get to be nominated? only articles which are already close to FA status? Is the FA nomination a process to better the quality or a judgement on the quality? Who gets to decide and how long does it get to change?

From Wikipedia:Featured article criteria

1. 1. "Well-written" the lack of other qualities makes this hard to qualify.
   2. Not "Comprehensive" - History seems too short, lacks Nintendo development story.
   3. I am unable to qualify "Factually accurate" because of it's criminal deficiency in sources
2. MOS
   1. The lead is concise, rather it is too concise.
   2. It does not use a consistently format for citations/references as it has only one.
3. It has images and other media that are helpful to the article.
4. It does not go into inadequate detail, opposite is true.

--Keerllston 15:02, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.