Wikipedia:Featured and good topic removal candidates/Celebration (Madonna album)/archive1

Celebration

edit

I believe the topic should include all the 10+ singles it covers. Only about half of them are GA/FA. Nergaal (talk) 21:56, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment This is poor process. At the moment there is a greatest hits GTC taking place. As this discussion involves a change in precedent, why not take the all hits/only singles discussion there. And the fact that no-one was notified is shocking. Adabow (talk · contribs) 05:11, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Despite this bad procedure, I would say that a greatest hits topic is incomplete without the hits. Adabow (talk · contribs) 22:05, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Ummm, not all of Madodnna's songs are singles from this greatest hits package. This nomination is absurd. It had two singles and a video. Keep Keep Keep.--CallMeNathanTalk2Me 05:17, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question for all those that vote keep: how does this topic pass criteria 1.d.:
There is no obvious gap (missing or stub article) in the topic. A topic must not cherry pick only the best articles to become featured together?
This topic is not titled "Singles from Celebration", so it should contain all the articles within the topic if they are notable enough to exist. Nergaal (talk) 05:25, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As Tbhotch pointed out, they are not released as singles from this album, and have no point here. This nomination is fundamentally flawed. — Legolas (talk2me) 05:32, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Leaving asides the COI, is this an Overview topic? No. Then all the songs within its scope should be included per 1.d. The compilation sold not just because of the singles, but because of all the songs that were included. The singles reasoning sounds like saying that a TV season topic should only include the episodes that were heavily promoted, like those that were run right after the SuperBowl or around similar events, and exclude those that were not marketed in an unusual fashion. Nergaal (talk) 06:05, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delist. This should not be considered a complete topic unless all of the songs on the album that are notable enough to have articles are at least GA status, not just the new songs on the album. A person reading this topic would want to learn about all of the songs on the album, not just the new ones. Grondemar 07:07, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]