Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 July 22
July 22
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was rename --Kbdank71 14:14, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Improperly capitalized and inconsistent use of abbreviation not used in other TV categories. Should be renamed Category:Television drama characters. Postdlf 17:05, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree with Postdlf. Pavel Vozenilek 23:19, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename as sugested. --Sherool 01:29, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was merge --Kbdank71 14:16, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I found the former marked up for deletion but saw it wasn't lised here. It's basically an empty category, I suggest we create a Category:July 2005 London bombings and merge them, because there's a great deal of cross-over between the two. -- Joolz 16:57, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I hope that whatever is in Category:7 July 2005 London Bombings, and the above, end up in related categories, such as "Terrorist incidents on transportation" I notice there are catefories for Terrorist incidents on Civil Aviation and on railway systems, but I not see a category for busses (there have been a lot in Israel) or ships (there was one many years ago where a tour ship was hijacked) ... perhaps a category for Piracy on the high seas, since the UN agency for that reports hundreds of incidents a year. AlMac|(talk) 20:56, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per above. Makes sense. Sasquatch′↔T↔C 04:23, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
- Merge as above and hope we don't need further renamings. Grutness...wha? 05:04, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge same. --AI 18:09, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- There don't seem to be any objections so I'll be bold and create the new category and depopulate the old -- Joolz 15:09, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge CanadianCaesar 23:37, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus (keep) --Kbdank71 13:52, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Marked for deletion by User:MicroFeet one minute after creation but not listed here. Someone from Sfd might want to look at this and User trumpet 1, 2, and 3 (all four have templates). Apparently it is like Babel, only with trumpets. --Kbdank71 14:18, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, looks like a joke. Pavel Vozenilek 23:20, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep, its not a joke. It is a serious category for trumpeters who are very good. If this gets deleted than i think that everything in Category:User instruments should be deleted as well. Jobe6 15:24, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
- I can see having Babel around to find people who speak your language if you need assistance. But why would you need to find other trumpeters? Why wouldn't you put this in a list of "Trumpeting wikipedians"? As for deleting everything else in User Instruments, great idea. --Kbdank71 16:58, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 14:11, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Deprecated by the system of Category:Cleanup_by_month. Radiant_>|< 12:18, July 22, 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was rename (no opposition at ToL) --Kbdank71 13:55, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to Category:Cleanup Tree of Life. Radiant_>|< 12:18, July 22, 2005 (UTC)
- COMMENT Wikipedia:WikiProject Tree of Life should discuss this, I don't think we should change the name unless it's discussed at the project. 132.205.44.43 14:40, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was merge --Kbdank71 14:02, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Not enough articles to justify a separate subcategory (currently has two articles). tregoweth 15:37, July 22, 2005 (UTC)
- Yeah, delete and move articles into Category:Looney Tunes. --Sherool 01:44, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was merge --Kbdank71 14:09, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
There is already Category:United States regional and state political parties, and that would be the appropriate place for these articles. No reason for Hawaii to have separate category for its parties. Perhaps a Politics of Hawaii category might be better. EdwinHJ | Talk 15:45, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- There are six entries, but there's already a Category:Hawaii politics which is rather underpopulated with those separated out (and the "STATE politics" category is reflected through all the U.S. state category structure; the state-specific political party category is not). Merge there and delete. Postdlf 17:05, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.