Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/CLT20RecordsUpdateBot

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Request Expired.

CLT20RecordsUpdateBot

Operator: Jfd34 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 16:52, Tuesday September 24, 2013 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Supervised

Programming language(s): PHP

Source code available: Special:PrefixIndex/User:CLT20RecordsUpdateBot/Source

Function overview: Update the tables at List of Champions League Twenty20 records and statistics

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): Usually 1 or 2 edits per day

Estimated number of pages affected: 1

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No):

Function details: Does the same task as IPLRecordsUpdateBot (already approved) for List of Champions League Twenty20 records and statistics. Data is obtained and parsed from stats.espncricinfo.com for updating the tables. Like IPLRecordsUpdateBot, this bot will not use the bot flag on its edits even if it has the permission to do so. Edits will be visible on watchlists, so that human editors can correct any errors.

Discussion

Approved for trial (10 updates). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Trial, as a this is a new botop. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 19:33, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The bot has made two anonymous edits by mistake, and has some trouble logging in. This should be fixed soon, I have reverted those edits for the time being. The issue is available on Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 120#Problem logging in with API. jfd34 (talk) 14:54, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It looks to me (from the bot contribs and above comment by bot-op), that

Trial complete.. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:13, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A user has requested the attention of the operator. Once the operator has seen this message and replied, please deactivate this tag. (user notified) So, how did the trial go, was it successful? Josh Parris 10:50, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

One day of editing in the last six weeks. Request Expired. without prejudice, if the operator wishes to re-open they are welcome to. Josh Parris 08:39, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.