WWE Batman131

WWE Batman131, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi WWE Batman131! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Anthony Johnson (fighter)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Anthony Johnson (fighter) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Anthony Johnson. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you.

Nothing against you

Hey man, nothing against you, but some of the changes you've been implementing recently are unorthodox to the articles. Some might end up being helpful, but others aren't really necessary. One example is the time each part of the card will begin. Honestly, ever since I started to see wikipedia articles for results (way before I started editing myself), they were never added and that's for a reason. I don't see the necessity for it (and all the previous events didn't have that need as well). Sometimes, like the Sweden event, they are mentioned due to big difference in local time and U.S time. But they're mentioned in the background. Anyway, too much info ends up being too much. For instance, we never added "(PPV)" to the main card because that was obvious, as all numbered events are ppvs, but it's okay to do it anyway. But I do feel that the time there is too much. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 23:16, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Re: UFC 184 Posters

Any and all posters I find or acquire are from UFC affiliated twitter accounts, friends and members of the MMA media again from Twitter, or the official UFC.com event programs which the UFC posts on their websites. If need be I can link the exact page from where I acquired the official UFC 184 event poster.--Imhungry4444 (talk) 18:53, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

The exact link would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. WWE Batman131 (talk) 19:02, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Last page: http://www.ufc.com/program --Imhungry4444 (talk) 22:07, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Benson-Thatch event poster

Yea you're right. Forgot the misc. info at the bottom is supposed to be there. Missed that. I'll wait until Sunday for the UFC to put the official event poster on Fight Pass.Imhungry4444 (talk) 00:51, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Re: Poster Trouble

Yea man, no problem. Those messages are a real nuisance.Imhungry4444 (talk) 16:28, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Keeping UFC Events Current

Thanks Dude!--Achim Hering (talk) 00:55, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you brother! We do our best. WWE Batman131 (talk) 00:59, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Need MMA help

Any help with Irene Aldana and Nina Ansaroff would be appreciated. Dwanyewest (talk) 13:50, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Chris

I hope you copied that page to your sandbox. If the April 18th fight is a win that would be a good time to put it up. In my mind two top tier fights with one a win, even though it is not quite there for WP:MMANOT, is a good time to put these articles up.Peter Rehse (talk) 20:09, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Will do. And yes, I have a copy stored in my notes. WWE Batman131 (talk) 20:12, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Creation of pages

Hey man, how are you? Not coming here to start a fight, but ultimately I've seen that you created a bunch of articles about fighters who aren't really that relevant - though they match the criteria that "allows" the creations of those articles; I believe the criteria is poor and vague, but that's what it is - but obviously I won't waste time on that, specially because that's not the point here. Even though that's not the matter I'm bringing, I'm sure it adds to the creation of the page UFC Fight Night: Mir vs. Duffee. You created an entirely blank page just to guarantee the creation of the page to be credited to you? Because it's the only reason and together with the huge number of fighter articles created recently, I can only diagnose that you're creating as much articles as you can to somehow claim your major importance to mma articles. While I do appreciate many of the contributions you do, I'd like to advise you (you are 15, right?) that this is not necessary. I wasn't going to create the article, don't have time or interest about doing it quickly, but you'd probably release it 100% or almost complete instead of a blank article. If a fighter has lost 3 fights out of 4 in the UFC, does that really make him that relevant or you just want to add info about that guy most people don't know about? As I said, it would match the "criteria", but there's really not enough relevance, right? Don't take this personally, you can create as much articles as you can, but be sure that quantity does not necessarily mean quality and I'm sure most (if not all) of regular editors believe in that. Thanks Gsfelipe94 (talk) 01:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

I'm doing fine. First off, what unnecessary fighter articles have I created? Ron Stallings, Ryan Benoit, Augusto Montaño, Thomas Almeida, and Shane Howell? I don't see the problem there. Perhaps you could elaborate as those fighters are considered notable under Wikipedia. That's not really a bunch either. I hope you're not mistaking me with someone else? I'm really confused, I've only created 5 fighter articles. Where do you see me trying to claim importance to MMA articles? I improve them just like you do. I was in no rush, I just didn't want an annoying user to create the article with the wrong name. How does it bother you in any way? It has no effect in you or your work. Yes, I'm 15 years old but I don't need a lesson from you. I knew what I was doing and I don't see anything I've done to legitimately disrupt the MMA Wikipedia community. Again, I do think you may be mistaking me for someone else. But, that's on you. I can answer any other concerns, if you'd like. WWE Batman131 (talk) 01:23, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

I can give you a point for the fighter creation articles, ok? But as I said, that's not my point. It's about that attitude of creation a blank article just to get the bragging rights of it. No annoying user can create articles as only registered people do it and the majority of those creations were by either Pptt43 (forgot his name) and another user. So there's really no "annoying user" out there. I'm not giving you a lesson, just an advice. You can contribute perfectly without those small details. And again, as I said, I appreciate the fact that you're a helpful editor. Keep on doing that, but just don't bother with those unnecessary styles. It's not "illegal", but it doesn't fit well. Regardless of that, I'm not picking a fight here, you should know that. See you next time. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 01:41, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Ok brother, I understand. Thanks for being civil. WWE Batman131 (talk) 01:57, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:UFC 186 event poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UFC 186 event poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:49, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Hot head

Hey dude, you're being too much of a hot head, even more than before it seems. I heard you were blocked a second time recently and if you don't take care about that aspect, it will be another one coming. Someone might report you for those comments against IPs or even registered editors. For your own sake, stop that. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 23:25, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Lol, wasn't it you that got reported for personal attacks? I just don't like careless mistakes. I'll calm down and you don't need to scold me every time you think I've done something wrong. Just mind your own business. Jesus. WWE Batman131 (talk) 23:30, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

No, it wasn't. As you might remember I have a wrongful block that was reverted right away as showed the exact thing that happened. "What the hell" to registered users is just the first step, man. Not that I'm offended by you, it was actually just a tip. I'm sure that by the way you comment those summaries and the reply here that we'll see it happen again. It was an advice about here, but it sure just went out of the window. Not wasting any time on trying to help you being a better editor in that aspect here. Keep doing what you like to do then. "Jesus". Gsfelipe94 (talk) 23:35, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

WWE Batman131, excuse me for poking my nose in but the heading here seemed relevant. It seems that Gsfelipe94 may be mentioning an edit summary similar to what I noticed here. Such comments are best avoided, and constitute a personal attack on an editor. The usual advice is to 'comment on the edit, not the editor', even if they are annoying the crap out of you. (Believe me, I've been there too!)

If it's of any interest there is a discussion about that editor, 71.97.48.49 (talk · contribs), at WP:AN/I#Disruptive edits in MMA articles by an unregistered user. Regards, 220 of ^Borg 02:40, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

I'll refrain from using such harsh language. It was out of line. Sorry. WWE Batman131 (talk) 02:59, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Rampage

Rampage jackson fight is back on — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.66.40.103 (talk) 23:06, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 26 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the UFC Fight Night: Edgar vs. Swanson page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:33, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Stubborn IP

Hey, I believe you've seen this IP 71.97.48.49 here getting on the nerves of editors as he does disruptive edits, some of them could be vandalism as well. Would you mind reporting him for that? He just keeps messing around and was already warned about it. Thanks Gsfelipe94 (talk) 03:40, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

RE: U.K.

Hello WWE Batman131. Your explanation about the U.K. doesn't make any sense. As you can read on the United Kingdom page, you'll see that Northern Ireland, Wales, England and Scotland are all in a sovereign state in Europe named the United Kingdom. All other European counties are more or less on their own and don't have such an addition. If you scroll all the way down on the List of UFC Events-page you'll see that Belfast is noted as a city of Northern Ireland within the United Kingdom. And all the past events in England have the addition "U.K." as you can see.

So believe it or not but the way I've added it is really the correct way. So please don't start about vandalism and blocking me. That really doesn't make sense. So I'll correct is again. If you still think it is wrong please say so.

Thanks.Luukmlgn (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 16:47, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

UFC Fight Night 78

Hey man, as you created the event, I suggest something for the future. They announced that this event would feature a finale for a new reality show Road to UFC: Japan. I'm not creating an article now and probably more info would be required before something like that it's done. If it really features the finals of the reality show, you could redirect the event to the reality page's just like other TUFs final. If the series does not end in that event, then they would probably be kept apart. Just an idea if that ends up being the case. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 16:12, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Alright, cool. WWE Batman131 (talk) 16:22, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Miesha Tate

Hi. We need to reach an accord about this, rather than edit warring. Firstly, there's nothing wrong with quotes and comments about a forthcoming fight. This is an article, not a Sherdog page, and plenty of articles about athletes have similar content.

Secondly, unless there's a Wikipedia policy that says "fight posters can only be used in event articles," there's nothing wrong with the image (I've seen a similar one in another pro fighter's article). I mean no harm; I'm attempting to expand the page based on good article standards, and the image is relevant to the article. -- James26 (talk) 20:07, 5 June 2015 (UTC) 20:06, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

dont know what you are talking about Helpmecan'tread (talk) 23:02, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

UFC 189 and similar edits

Pest is once again a good opportunity for report, huh? Lucky for you I'm let it pass now. The thing is, you took 13 minutes from the first edit to the addition of the source. As soon as news break on twitter, is there such hurry to update? Why not wait for a official link with a source to add it altogether? You've been doing that for a while and it's just as like those speedies we complain on events that do not wait for official announcement to update the result. I'm not picking on you, I'd do it with anyone who did the same thing. It just happens to be you at the moment. I don't see any other reason to keep this going and don't see an argument to defend yourself just like speedies in that situation do not have one. I'm not rushing to update anything either, I've said it before and I'll say it again. Even though you won't change this "hot head" way of yours, you still help a lot with articles. But you gotta comprehend that if someone complains, you should really see if they're right or just over the top with words. Honestly, I'm not. And one other thing, please do not edit irrelevant or other stuff in articles just to "chat" on the page. It's better to do just like I've done here and reach a talk page. Either the article's or the editor's one. Direct comments are welcome as it refers to something specific. If you change it again, then it makes sense to reply in the summary. It's a bummer Aldo had to pull out once again of a title fight. Don't think McGregor will defeat Mendes, though the short notice does give him a better chance of winning it. If he doesn't, he might get a fight Siver-like but with a bigger name to get a shot soon. Take care. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 01:02, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

I appreciate the subtlety. I just try my best to prevent mistakes before they happen. I will admit that I sometimes take offence from things I shouldn't, but you have to remember that I'm only 16 ;) WWE Batman131 (talk) 01:28, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:UFC 189 pre sale.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UFC 189 pre sale.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Speedy Updates

In back to back fights? Dude, the article is protected. Why such hurry to update it? You barely waited for scorecards announcements. Simmer down, man. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 01:34, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Reducing image sizes

Please in the future, if you want to reduce image sizes, make sure you do so in a way that maintains the proportions of the image and the image quality. Your resizing of File:WWE Battleground 2015 Official Poster.jpg did neither of these. The easiest way to do this in the future is to simply tag the image with {{Non-free reduce}} and a bot will do it automatically in a few hours. Thank you. TrueCRaysball | ^#RaysUp 05:45, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Machida's kick

First off, I believe that the purpose of this site is to best describe the action, event, item or person in the most useful and practical manner. Second, the crane kick, although perhaps made for a movie, is nonetheless the most commonly accepted term that also gives the reader the best depiction of the maneuver. However I would like to note that the more technical description as you gave (in my opinion) would be useful to describe the crane kick on a separate page. [[96.33.75.187 (talk) 21:06, 21 July 2015 (UTC)]]--96.33.75.187 (talk) 21:06, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

I would be very interested to know if you have heard of any one describe this technique as a "flying front kick". I know a taekwondo black belt that has demonstrated this kick calling it a crane kick. Joe Rogan (UFC Color commentator) stated during the broadcast, that the kick was a crane kick after Lyoto landed it. Although I do recognize that this kick may have been made for a movie that does not discredit the fact that it is the technique’s proper name. I have gone back and watched the kick and there is the same leg and arm motion from Machida to Macchio. Also, if a fighter in competition (however ridiculous and unrealistic it is) grabbed his opponent’s pointer finger with his own pointer finger and thumb then proceeded to flex his little finger thus producing an enormous shockwave of energy. What name would you give such a technique?

Chill

Hi WWE Batman131. Please, do what i've put in the heading, and relax a bit. Edit summaries such as For someone who hasn't watched "The Karate Kid", they don't know what a crane kick is. REALITY triumphs FICTION. Stop arguing are perhaps not helpful, even less so when the content of the edit contains shouting (you do know that ALL CAPS IS SEEN AS SHOUTING, right?). And calling someone a fool, as you did here and here, is definitely a Personal Attack, which you must not do. I notice that you have been blocked a couple of times previously; please, dial it back a notch or three and don't risk another. Thanks, Cheers, Lindsay^Hello 15:48, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Okay. Sorry. WWE Batman131 (talk) 16:04, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Re: Tate-Eye

Sure. After I watch the episode later I'll see what I can do. -- James26 (talk) 20:57, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Hey. I've seen the episode, and I'm honestly not too sure that Eye's story about Tate is worth mentioning in the articles. With that incident, she mostly discusses Tate on a personal level, so I don't see much relevance to their fight. Maybe if they'd had words back then about fighting each other one day... In any case, thanks for giving me a heads-up about the episode. -- James26 (talk) 19:44, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

UFC 195

You consider that tweet a source? Really? No desperation, man. You get to create those articles with no problem, but if that's put up to deletion, it goes down quickly. No need for that stuff.Gsfelipe94 (talk) 22:02, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Botter also reported the UFC 194 news, so he is a reliable source. Dana White announced himself that Aldo-McGregor would take place on the New Year's card and would be held in Vegas at the MGM Grand. Ariel Helwani and Jeremy Botter have stated that the definite date is January 2nd. Chronologically, the event would be UFC 195. It's all pieces of a simple puzzle that even a baby could put together. BTW, it's interesting that you use the word "desperation". That means you do indeed monitor all my edits. So, how about you hop off my back and stop scolding me for edits that displease you? I knew what I was doing, I'm not new to this. If it does get taken down, then that's that. WWE Batman131 (talk) 22:35, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

So reliable that nothing came out about it, huh? You had that hidden update about a possible December event, so that show you how nothing is certain until a full source states it. Like that one, is there a chance it happens like this? Yes, but still, no need to hurry with creations. I saw the 194 event at the List of UFC events page and checked who created it. That way I was able to see your contributions and saw the 195 creation. So how about you start cooling that necessity to be the first one so quickly? I'm not interested in starting articles like that, you can create them all you want. Just please wait until official news come out, not a "reliable guy on twitter" regardless of what he said before. 194 was noticed with a official source, 195 not. I don't know where you saw Helwani saying it. CM Punk interview? That was speculation on his side, just as thinking that Punk's debut will be at the same one. Peace. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 06:47, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Ways to improve UFC 193

Hi, I'm Bobtinin. WWE Batman131, thanks for creating UFC 193!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Good job on your UFC 193 article! I found no big problems with it, just add some more references from reliable sources. Keep up the good work!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Bobtinin (talk) 03:35, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.
Everything you did was avoidable. You let yourself get into a fight you knew there was nothing to gain. Once again, it's a learning experience. You bring helpful contributions, but you also let your emotions get the best of you in plenty of situations. Anyway, it's done now. I know you were right at first, but the path you took to defend it was wrong. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 03:15, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring and personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Swarm ♠ 07:37, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:UFN Japan 2015 poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UFN Japan 2015 poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Red Hot

Hey man, glad to see you're back to your exact old manners ;) Gsfelipe94 (talk) 22:45, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

You think I'm red hot? Thanks ;) WWE Batman131 (talk) 01:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

That was supposed to be hot head, but instead it was a typo lol. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 02:02, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cerrone vs Means.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cerrone vs Means.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, WWE Batman131. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

UFC Fight Night 129

Hi WWE Batman131, Greetings. I have moved back the above event to UFC Fight Night 129 as no source indicated Magny vs. Ponzinibbio headline this event at the moment. Page move could be done it is supported by direct source. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:41, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Keep hidden wiki text - until fights have finished - No future bout

Hi WWE Abtman131, I have added back your recent edits on Rose Namajunas and Khabib Nurmagomedov where you have removed the hidden wiki text code. Please note "Never add future bouts. The purpose of the record table is to provide a quick account of a fighter's past career, not to speculate about his/her future: - pls see WP:MMABOX. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:16, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

UFC 223 poster

Hello!

I would like to ask you - where did you find updated UFC 223 poster with Al Iaquita on it? I can't find it anywhere with proper resolution. Thanks for you help !

Miko55555 (talk) 09:06, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

UFC Fight Night 134

Hi, Greetings to you. I have moved back the page to its original name, as no official announcement made that Volkan Oezdemir vs. Maurício Rua would definitely headlines the event and it is also not found in UFC web site. You could move it back when it is officially stated in UFC web site. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 21:07, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

October 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at UFC on Fox 31. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 02:35, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi WWE Batman131, Greetings to you. You have been informed - see message on your talk page titled UFC Fight Night 134 of not moving the page until the headline bout is shown in UFC.com web site. Please refrain yourself from doing so here onward. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 02:37, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Suggestion for WikiMMAProject

@WWE Batman131: MMA Suggestion - Can you take a look at this suggestion if is good? Colton Meltzer (talk) 22:48, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, WWE Batman131. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at UFC on ESPN+ 3. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 22:37, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi WWE Batman131, Greetings. UFC on ESPN: Ngannou vs. Velasquez. Pls do check what is reliable source and not. Twitter is not considered a reliable source as it is user generated site just like fb, linkedIn, Instragram. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:21, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

File:UFConESPN1poster.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:10, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:UFConESPN1poster.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UFConESPN1poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:UFC 235 poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UFC 235 poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

UFC Fight Night: Till vs. Masvidal

Hi WWE Batman131, Greetings. Your edit has been reverted. Pls check the source against the fight card and do not change source as bout is not stated yet (one bout is no there). Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:48, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

UFC on ESPN 4

Hi WWE Batman131, Pls do not move the page to different name when it is not on UFC.com fight info/card. Only change the name when the new name is appear in UFC web site. thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:12, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:UFC Sunrise 2019 poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UFC Sunrise 2019 poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

November 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at UFC on ESPN: Overeem vs. Rozenstruik. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:52, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

WWE Batman131, you have been informed before not to rename the event name until it is shown on the UFC.com event page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:54, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

December 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at UFC Fight Night 167, you may be blocked from editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 02:28, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi WWE Batman131, good day. you have been informed many times not to move the page until the event name appears in UFC.com web sites. Please stop doing so for you will be blocked if you continue such actions. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 02

30, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

April 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at UFC on ABC: Till vs. Vettori. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Cassiopeia^(talk) 02:14, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello WWE Batman131, Again as you have been informed before, pls do NOT move the page until the event name is shown on UFC.com event page. Cassiopeia^(talk) 02:15, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

How many years I've been here and yet the same problem with pages. Why is such a fess put up when an event name is going to be a formality? If a source is credible enough (i.e., Helwani and Okamoto) for the page to include the bout in an announced bouts section, why can't the page be moved on that basis? Perhaps you and whoever is still active in "monitoring" these pages should make some sort of vote because I'm pretty sure the last 1000 times a page was moved using a source, it ended up on UFC's website which is always slow to add bouts we know are official. But it's whatever. Good day. WWE Batman131 (talk) 18:40, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi WWE Batman131, Good day. When the press announced the headliner but it is yet to be shown on UFC.event page which means it is not yet official. We, the regular mm editors always checked the name in UFC.com event page first moving doing the move keep the UFN xxx as redirect. Now the Vittori vs. Holland is shown in UFC event page, the pages name has been changed/moved. Take care and best. Cassiopeia^(talk) 22:56, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)