Veronia.so

Speedy deletion nomination of Jessi Frick

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jessi Frick, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DannyS712 (talk) 01:09, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 01:40, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi! Wasn't intending on it to be promotional at all. All content was based solely on research and was cited with interviews and articles. Is there a way I could get my post back to at least edit?

No, I do not restore advertisements. In this case, the article was full of inappropriate external links (one external link is permitted to a subject's official site at the bottom of the article; none may be in the article text), and was full of inappropriately puffy material such as is also known for founding ("is known" by whom, according to what reliable and independent source?), Growing up, Frick's parents would take her to countless concerts fostering her desire to work with artists (completely inappropriate "get to know ya" stuff), Frick became obsessed with ("obsessed" according to what reliable and independent source?), It inevitably shaped the types of recording that her label would one day sign ("Inevitably" according to what reliable and independent source? Interviews aren't independent so generally aren't acceptable), and on and on from there. Articles must stay strictly neutral in tone and content, and must not in any way promote or "talk up" their subjects. Basically, articles should stay rather dry, even to being a bit boring, and stick strictly to facts. Boring is better than non-neutral. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 02:16, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

I'll fix all of that. Thanks for your help!

Your thread has been archived

Hi Veronia.so! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Is this article neutral/reliable enough?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 18 July 2020 (UTC)