Vatadoshu
EN EN EN EN EN EN
edit1
| Wikipedia:Babel | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| Search user languages |
3
| Babel user information | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| Users by language |
{{Hidden begin|title= début}}
{{Hidden end}}
https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine#CKS.2C_a_service_of_NICE
- le gadget toolbarnotif il est où?
- je n'arrive pas à trouver les équivalents sur la wikipédia anglaise de ces pages de la wikipedia francaise:
avenue: https://fr.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Avenue_des_caf%C3%A9s_et_bistros
café des traductions: https://fr.wiki.x.io/wiki/Projet:Traduction/Bistro
bistro: https://fr.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Le_Bistro
ambass
editactifs en 2015 (à partir d'une contribution):
- Anthere
- Rdb -> name change? Benutzer:rdb
- Booksworm
- Oreo Priest
- Neranei -> name change Keilana
- User:Thesocialistesq-> name change AndySimpson
- Tamfang
- rʨanaɢ ->name change? Rjanag
- WATERFOX -> name change KuduIO
- Ericleb01
- Grind24
hum
edit- je me demande si je met un lien francais de ce type:
{{Lien|fr = Antidépresseur noradrénergique et sérotoninergique spécifique|trad = Noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant|lang = en|texte = Antidépresseurs noradrénergique et sérotoninergique spécifique (NaSSA)}}
y a t il un robot qui va passer et transformer le lien WP francais en lien WP anglais?
(sur wikipedia français, quand on met un lien de la wikipedia anglais, des robots passent et traduisent et rendent conforme le lien à wikipedia français)
- j'ai un problème quand je met un lien sur wikipedia anglais:
exemple: "WHO Expert Committee on Drug Dependence – WHO Technical Report Series, No. 915 – Thirty-third Report". apps.who.int. 2003. Retrieved 26 February 2015.
le access date est rouge, je sais pas pourquoi. je met 5 tildés pour mettre la date, mais ça ne fonctionne pas. pourtant vu ici: https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Template:Accessdate
Vatadoshu (talk) 08:35, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Salut,
- Je suis pas souvent sur wiki:en, mais pour le robot non, ça ne se change pas automatiquement du français à l'anglais. Et dans le champ accessdate tu as le droit à deux formats de date : soit Jour Mois Année (en l'occurrence 26 February 2015), ou Année-mois-jour (2015-02-26). — Symbolium [what ?] 18 mars 2015 à 14:23 (CET)
- test1. Retrieved 15:35, 18 March 2015 (UTC).
- test2 "WHO Expert Committee on Drug Dependence – WHO Technical Report Series, No. 915 – Thirty-third Report". apps.who.int. 2003. Retrieved 26 February 2015.
- test3 "WHO Expert Committee on Drug Dependence – WHO Technical Report Series, No. 915 – Thirty-third Report". apps.who.int. 2003. Retrieved 15:35, 18 March 2015 (UTC).
{{cite web}}: Check date values in:|access-date=(help) - test4 "WHO Expert Committee on Drug Dependence – WHO Technical Report Series, No. 915 – Thirty-third Report". apps.who.int. 2003. Retrieved 15:35, 18 March 2015 (UTC).
{{cite web}}: Check date values in:|accessdate=(help) - test5 "WHO Expert Committee on Drug Dependence – WHO Technical Report Series, No. 915 – Thirty-third Report". apps.who.int. 2003. Retrieved 26 February 2015.
jean
edit@Jean Marcotte:
salut jean.
j'ai une question qui concerne ce wikipédia anglais. et comme je suis nulle à me faire comprendre par les anglais (quand j'explique un truc ils comprennent jamais rien), du coup je me suis dis que j'allais te demander. - quand je traduit un truc de l'anglais vers le francais ça marche mais pas dans le sens inverse, c'est unilatéral.
bref ma question:
sur wikipédia il y a des robots qui transforment les liens anglais des réf en lien francais. (quand on fait une traduction d'un article wikipédia anglais vers un article wikipédia français).
je me demandais si l'inverse existait aussi.
si sur wikipédia anglais si je met une référence francaise:
''<ref>{{site web |url=http://www.example.org/ |titre=My Favorite Things, Part II |auteur=John |date=30 April 2005 |date d'accès=26 February 2015}}{{citation|blablabla}}</ref>''
est ce qu'y a un robot qui va passer et transformer les balises francaises en balises anglaises?
comme ça :
''<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.example.org/ |title=My Favorite Things, Part II |author=Doe |date=30 April 2005 |access-date=26 February 2015}}{{quote|blabla}}</ref>''
j'attends tes éclaircissements, Vatadoshu (talk) 13:31, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
et pourquoi ma notif {{reply to|Jean_Marcotte}} marche pas?
- Désolé, je n'en ai aucune idée, ne travaillant pas sur Wikipedia:en ni ne fréquentant son bistro. Quant au fonctionnement du modèle Reply to, c'est peut-être à cause du souligné ajouté entre mon prénom et mon nom ? Jean Marcotte (talk) 07:50, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Jean Marcotte:
- ben quand tu répond ton nom est en rouge aussi...:) alala moi qui pensais à toi en me disant mais jean il est dans son monde là bas. snif. t'a eu une notif quand même ou pas(pour cette section)?
- bon je me suis permis de mettre un point sur ta page utilisateur. ça a bleuit ton nom. c'était ça qui allait pas.Vatadoshu (talk) 11:18, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
lqsfh — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.220.213.7 (talk) 15:41, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
edit
- Hi Vatadoshu! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 09:50, Tuesday, May 26, 2015 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!
edit- please help translate this message into the local language
|
The Cure Award |
| In 2015 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs, and we would love to collaborate further. |
Thanks again :) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 03:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Doc James Hi Doc James, i wonder, are there a thing on wikipedia that can put an access on ncbi articles (not abstract but full the article)? Does joining the wikiproject medicine foundation give an access to ncbi articles (not abstract but full the article)?
thanks. Vatadoshufrench 17:32, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
- User:Vatadoshu the Wikipedia Library can help with access to full text. There are also other places one can find such access. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:36, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Appium
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Appium, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:56, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- Walter Görlitz sorry i am not familiar with wikipedia "en". " because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted "-> i have written only one sentence without any matérial previously deleted by other. it is my own creation with my own sources. what should i do to it will be not deleted? i have put 2 sources that are correct i think Vatadoshufrench 14:08, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Appium
edit If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Appium, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:14, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- user:Walter Görlitz ok so the draft will be deleted and the article will be deleted^^ Vatadoshufrench 16:17, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Appium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Appium (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —swpbT 15:51, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GAPS diet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GAPS diet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:16, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
edit | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Appium (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
The article Ninja diet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This page has multiple issues, the notability and verifiability of the subject matter are questionable at best. Furthermore, the sources given are suspect, some are unavailable and others are non-academic sources (see naruto guide). Ultimately I don't think the notability of the subject matter is sufficient for wikipedia.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Ninja diet
editHello Vatadoshu,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ninja diet for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.