Varxx

Virginia Tech shootings

Greetings!

Not trying to be overly picky, but matters relating to the perpetrator identification (and the facts in general) ought to have a reference cited directly in the article. Otherwise the origin of the fact will get lost in the edit history.

Thanks! Rtucker 00:32, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Eric Harris

I did not revert your re-addition of the material. I did add the tag. I believe that if they truly did not like the music that there is some sort of source out there which states that, AND which states how they know the information. A friend saying they didn't listen to Manson isn't reputable, my friends don't know what kind of music I listen to, like i'm sure you're don't. Either way, I think the information AT LEAST deserves to be sourced. 74.132.172.179 18:13, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Nedm

A tag has been placed on Nedm, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Android Mouse Bot 2 15:33, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

General note: Vandalism on PlayStation 3. using TW

July 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to PlayStation 3, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Giggy _U^CP 04:45, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Mc chris is dead

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Mc chris is dead, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 19:00, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Redirect of Jet pack industries

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Jet pack industries, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Jet pack industries is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Jet pack industries, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 16:00, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TacticalIntevention Cover Image.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TacticalIntevention Cover Image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:27, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of CellFactor: Combat Training for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CellFactor: Combat Training is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CellFactor: Combat Training until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 20:40, 30 November 2018 (UTC)