Vampirerabbit
April 2009
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ball Tongue, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ball Tongue was changed by Vampirerabbit (u) (t) blanking the page on 2009-04-19T11:46:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 11:46, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Help request
editI've moved this helpme request from Talk:Ball Tongue to your own talk page; it's easier to deal with helpme on your own page. Chzz ► 12:05, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Why is the article 'Ball tongue' removing to the article 'Korn (album)' ??
Ball tongue is a song of this album, it has nothing to do with the album himself ! There's a link between the two one, but it's not Ball Tongue = Korn (album)...Is someone agreeing with this ?
- Well, I can't think of much other use for Ball Tongue, so I see now harm in the redirect, unless you can think of a reason? ie a user typing that in is indeed likely to be looking for the track by Korn.
- We often have redirects from music tracks that have no article of their own, redirecting users to articles on the band that mention the track.
- Redirects don't cost anything, so I don't see any point in removing it.
- If you disagree, please let me know on my talk page, or talk to us live.
- Best, Chzz ► 12:01, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- (e/c) It is redirected there, and the reason is that this was the result of the deletion debate for the article. As can be seen, the existing article did not have sufficient sources for a stand-alone article and it was redirected to the album until such time as there are sufficient reliable sources to verify an article. Note also the requirements for song articles listed at Wikipedia:Notability (music)#Albums, singles and songs. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:10, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I agree with this system, I just don't find it very...precise. For example, I looked at first, after the redirection, if the album hadn't two names (Korn and Ball Tongue), like the album of Metallica, which has two names : Metallica and the Black Album =-/ Vampirerabbit (talk) 12:22, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- We use redirects for many more things other than alternate names. It is a common method of preserving a name (meaning it won't be a redlink) for a target name that we don't want to have an article at, or where an article existed but it wasn't proper and it is likely to be recreated, or we want to preserve the page history of a former article that we would otherwise delete, or to preserve a former article name as an access target that has been moved to a correct or better name. If you familiarize yourself with how page histories work, you can find out yourself why something was redirected by going into the history of the redirect. To access the redirect, and thus its history, navigate to the page using the redirected name and you'll see at the top "redirected from ____". Clicking that will give you access. By the way, is your alternate name possibly the Rabbit of Caerbannog?--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:40, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I agree with this system, I just don't find it very...precise. For example, I looked at first, after the redirection, if the album hadn't two names (Korn and Ball Tongue), like the album of Metallica, which has two names : Metallica and the Black Album =-/ Vampirerabbit (talk) 12:22, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Welcome
editHi, Vampirerabbit. This is NOT some automated message...it's from a real person. You can talk to me right now. Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed you've just joined, and wanted to give you a few tips to get you started. If you have any questions, please talk to us. The tips below should help you to get started. Best of luck! Chzz ► 12:07, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Good luck with editing; please drop me a line some time on my own talk page. There's lots of information below. Once again, welcome to the fantastic world of Wikipedia!
|
Other Question...
editHi...
Here we can see that the single Moving to New york is released under 14th Floor Records, but in the right table it's written "Label - 14th Floor"
Here it's written "Label - 14th Floor Records"
Which do we have to say ? 14th Floor or 14th Floor Records... ThanksVampirerabbit (talk) 18:26, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- I would use "14th floor records", as it is the name of the label: http://www.14thfloorrecords.com/. --ZombieCow (talk) 20:12, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks :D Vampirerabbit (talk) 17:19, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Album Cover
editHi, I found the cover of the EP Dudebox (that isn't on Wikipedia), but I don't know anything about how posting it, or if it's under a copyright or not, etc... I'd need some help, thanks =DVampirerabbit (talk) 12:56, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- Hi,
- It is certainly under copyrights, but you can nonetheless upload it (use Wikipedia:Upload or the "Upload file" link in the left toolbox) as "A cover or other page from a book, DVD, newspaper, magazine, or other such source" under the fair use rationale. Please take the greatest care while choosing the License that will apply in the drop-down list (I guess it will be an "Album or single cover").
- Calimo (talk) 10:51, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot Vampirerabbit (talk) 15:53, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:At seventeen (Janis ian single cover).jpg
editThanks for uploading File:At seventeen (Janis ian single cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:23, 14 December 2018 (UTC)