Umeshberma
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:List of Maithili writers
edit
Category:List of Maithili writers, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 03:51, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Your recent edits
edit
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:39, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Thaker pic
editHi apparently you say your the editors at the Vedeha website , but this pic - do you own it, did you tale it yourself? Have you got the original? as the one you are uploading appears to be a cut and copy from the web.http://www.videha.co.in/new_page_27.htm - Off2riorob (talk) 00:09, 6 May 2011 (UTC) Although I already answered it when the photo was removed by one of wikipedia editors last time and then was reverted when I gave the explanation. However I am saying again that this photo was photographed by me and was uploaded to www.videha.co.in with low resolution using the website designer. The high resolution original photo was uploaded to wikipedia and then also the wikipedia editor objected that the photo seemed same as that was on www.videha.co.in; after that I provided the above explanation that I am Asst. Editor of videha and I uploaded the photo there and the picture at wikipedia is the full resolution photo of that picture; however at the same time alongwith the explanation I uploaded another photo; but the explanation was accepted by the wikipedia editor and this photo was reverted back to its place. This photo and that photo at http://www.videha.co.in/new_page_27.htm both belongs to me. regards--Umeshberma (talk) 17:46, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
The file was reverted and I was told not to overwrite files, see the decision at [[1]] [Nuvola apps important yellow.svg I noticed that you uploaded a file using the name File:GajendraThakur.jpg. A file by this name already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its original version. If the file you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you!
For more information, see Commons:Avoid overwriting images with new uploads.
...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 08:12, 5 February 2011 (UTC)]
However I am changing the file at http://www.videha.co.in/new_page_27.htm as many people have many problems with it. Regards.--Umeshberma (talk) 19:32, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
The change of image discussion is at [[2]]Italic text full text [08:10, 5 February 2011 (diff | hist) User talk:Umeshberma (→File:GajendraThakur.jpg) 08:08, 5 February 2011 (diff | hist) File:GajendraThakur.jpg 08:07, 5 February 2011 (diff | hist) N File talk:GajendraThakur.jpg (←Created page with 'I am the Assistant Editor of www.videha.co.in and I have uploaded www.videha.co.in/gajendra.jpg file on www.videha.co.in. However I have Changed that image and now...') (top) 08:02, 5 February 2011 (diff | hist) File:GajendraThakur.jpg (uploaded a new version of File:GajendraThakur.jpg: New Improved Image) 07:57, 5 February 2011 (diff | hist) File:GajendraThakur.jpg (uploaded a new version of File:GajendraThakur.jpg: New Improved Image) 07:44, 5 February 2011 (diff | hist) N File:GajendraThakur.jpg (
| Description |
English: Gajendra Thakur |
|---|---|
| Source |
Own work |
| Date |
2009 |
| Author |
Umeshberma |
| Permission (Reusing this file) |
See below.
|
) ]
As the file was reverted so I thought the chapter is over, I was then ready to replace that file with another one, but the editor was kind enough to revert it. But now I it has come up again, so i changed the file at http://www.videha.co.in/new_page_27.htm. thanks and regards --Umeshberma (talk) 19:41, 6 May 2011 (UTC) Copyright permissions sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. thanks.--Umeshberma (talk) 05:18, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Wiki editing
editHiya
I see you've been contributing to the Maithili article and related pages. It would be helpful to other editors if you included a short edit summary with each change. There is no need to remove red-linked text for links to wiki pages that don't currently exist - if you mention something that you feel should / would have an article in the future, then these can be left - there are people who monitor red-linked subjects to see whether to create them.
Best wishes
Martinlc (talk) 10:03, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
ok, got it.--Umeshberma (talk) 10:09, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the additions to Gajendra Thakur - when you include quotes from other writers these should be provided with full sourcing (so if it's in an article, listing the article, publication date etc) - otherwise it's unverifiable and shouldn't be included. I get the impression that the Maithili language writing community is small and not well-represented in institutions, which may be why finding good sources is hard. Martinlc (talk) 10:42, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Thanks Martinlc, I have added the references from various sources, I am also localising Maithili Language in Wiki and have just completed 500 most used messages last night. You will soon find representation of Maithili in institutions. However I am sure that the volumes of manuscripts that Gajendra Thakur has deciphered and transliterated, this kind of work if made in English, would make the person Head of the Department of Geneologists/ ethnology at US and European Universities. Regards..--Umeshberma (talk) 10:58, 9 May 2011 (UTC) However having said this, as most of his work is in digitized form and available online it won't be difficult to assess the works, assess the devotion/labor to save one's literary history and cultural references; even with little source of references the works are here for the world to be assessed independently also.--Umeshberma (talk) 11:05, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Removing AfD template
edit Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Gajendra Thakur. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot t • c » 23:24, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
It is an error because this template was earlier placed and after consensus it was removed (you may see it in archive), the same comments I have given again.--Umeshberma (talk) 04:24, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
It is in respect of Articles of deletion / Gajendra Thakur. As if it happens again and again it is like a system breakdown.--Umeshberma (talk) 04:46, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)