Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - LouisAragon (talk) 17:19, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- You are a pro-Iranian nationalist who deliberately tries to add speculative sources in favor of Iran as opposed to real sources, including ancient Persian sources. Uchagagnidze24 (talk) 19:16, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Uchagagnidze24, leave out the personal attacks please. I could leave a templated warning, but I hope you will consider this note as a friendly one. Please. Drmies (talk) 19:19, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- This is not a personal attack. Not only me, he imposed bans on other Georgians for his own nationalistic motives and is supported by the second Iranian administrator.
- Do you know why I have a ban on CeRcVa13? Because I objected to the map of the Achaemenid Empire, He does not even have 1 source where it is written that Colchis was in the 18th satrapy. It has a speculative theory written by the only author and considers it a reliable source. I also objected to one page "Safavid Georgia" where the names of the Georgian kings were written in Iranian, and Georgian kingdoms were written in the title as provinces of Iran, which is a historical anachronism.
- The Iranians, like the Russians, are terrible imperialists who constantly claim that the Caucasus is their property. Uchagagnidze24 (talk) 08:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Uchagagnidze24, leave out the personal attacks please. I could leave a templated warning, but I hope you will consider this note as a friendly one. Please. Drmies (talk) 19:19, 9 January 2024 (UTC)