Turukkaean

Welcome at my talkpage.

Welcome!

Hi Turukkaean! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!

Turkic people

Hi. Not sure why you can't confirm the information as you said here [1][2]. If you are doing keyword search you should do "blond", not "blonde" for example. Feel free to contact Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard or Wikipedia:Teahouse if you would like to ask uninvolved editors as well. Bogazicili (talk) 11:04, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

August 22

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Turkic peoples, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tutsens Woman (talk) 22:36, 22 Aug 2021 (UTC)

Please read and understand WP:TOPIC and WP:OR. I have already explained that your edit is in violation of these Wikipedia policies. There is not a reason to include fringe descriptions about an minority section of the Xiongnu into the article of Turkic peoples. This is also WP:Weight. Either you read and understand these rules or you will have the problem. I hope this makes is clear for you now.Turukkaean (talk) 05:01, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Please seek consensus on talk page for changes. Also you have been edit warring and might have broken Wikipedia:Edit_warring#The_three-revert_rule Bogazicili (talk) 14:38, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Visioncurve^{Timendi causa est nescire} 06:14, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:WorldCreaterFighter per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WorldCreaterFighter. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- RoySmith (talk) 18:41, 29 November 2021 (UTC)