TryingToDo

Welcome!

Hi TryingToDo! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Roller26 (talk) 20:28, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you Roller26. TryingToDo (talk) 20:33, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

March 2021

Hello, I'm Roller26. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Break Up Story—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Roller26 (talk) 20:37, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Ok. Thank you TryingToDo (talk) 20:40, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sreemoyee. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sreemoyee was changed by TryingToDo (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.871219 on 2021-03-01T19:36:23+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:36, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Flyover (film)

Hello TryingToDo, thanks for creating Flyover. You have done a good job, but you have to do wikilink. I have done little bit. Now go to cast section and do how I just did. And do more edit. Thanks

Ok I'll do that TryingToDo (talk) 20:21, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Hello newbie, keep doing good work. Wish to see more contributions from you in future. If you have any question feel free to write on my talk page. Cheers

DasSoumik (talk) 10:25, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

DasSoumik thank you for the kitten TryingToDo (talk) 20:21, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ghosh Sultanpur Primary School

The article Ghosh Sultanpur Primary School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not pass WP:NORG; I was not able to find any independent, secondary sources addressing this primary school directly and in significant detail.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:23, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Ghosh Sultanpur Primary School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ghosh Sultanpur Primary School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghosh Sultanpur Primary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:00, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Ei Ami Renu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ei Ami Renu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ei Ami Renu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Citterz (talk) 18:34, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hoichoi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kamini. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ami Sudhu Tor Holam

The article Ami Sudhu Tor Holam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM. All current citations are film database sites.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 18:16, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Navigation

Hallo, Thank you for creating Cakewalk (film) . When you create an article like this with a "disambiguated" title, please make sure that the reader can find it from the basic name (ie Cakewalk), by adding or expanding a hatnote, or adding the article to a disambiguation page. This helps the reader to find your article, and also reduces the chance of a future careless editor creating a duplicate article with a slightly different disambiguator. I've fixed this one (adding it to Cakewalk (disambiguation), which is linked from Cakewalk). Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD 09:40, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Vivek Mishraa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vivek Mishraa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivek Mishraa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Celestina007 (talk) 15:33, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Falaque Rashid Roy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parineeta.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jagadish Chandra Barma Basunia has been accepted

Jagadish Chandra Barma Basunia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheWikiholic (talk) 17:18, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manoj Kumar Oraon has been accepted

Manoj Kumar Oraon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

─ The Aafī ^(talk) 10:49, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bishal Lama has been accepted

Bishal Lama, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 00:41, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suman Kanjilal has been accepted

Suman Kanjilal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

─ The Aafī ^(talk) 11:24, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kaushik Roy (politician) has been accepted

Kaushik Roy (politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 12:41, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dipak Barman has been accepted

Dipak Barman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 09:07, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pradip Kumar Barma has been accepted

Pradip Kumar Barma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DanCherek (talk) 13:44, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khageswar Roy has been accepted

Khageswar Roy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 07:56, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Minhajul Arfin Azad has been accepted

Minhajul Arfin Azad, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~SS49~ {talk} 09:30, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Explanation of behaviour

Can you please explain me why you are saying that my article, Annwesha Hazra, looks like an advertisement???Mynameisparitoshmandal (talk) 05:39, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alma Matters: Inside the IIT Dream has been accepted

Alma Matters: Inside the IIT Dream, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 10:48, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:null per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alokechatterjee3. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 23:47, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TryingToDo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi I am from kolkata. And I started editing after speaking with some bengali wikipedians. Previously I used to edit anonymously and after talking with some bengali wikipedians(they are experienced and they are editing wikipedia since long years some are writing on bengali language, some english language and some are adding photos on wikimedia) they suggested me to register an account. And I registered an account and started editing by taking their advise and I also participated a bengali wikiproject and I was one of the winners. And on 25 may I also had attended a zoom survey for wikipedia. After the bengali project I started editing in english wikipedia and here also I took help of my seniors who told me to start editing by registering an account. Now recently I added tags(Advert, COI) on an article name Annwesha Hazra. I added advert tag because the article was written like an advertisement. And I added COI tag because the editor who has created the article he/she has created the article in my multiple name. After that I was selected for a checkuser. And I am not sure why they had selected me as a checkuser. As I started my editing journey by taking advice from my senior editor and I and now recently editing only through afc process. And I saw my editing pattern is different and their editing pattern is different. Now I dont know why I am selected as a checkuser. Bengal Boy (talk) 4:47, 27 May 2021 (UTC) Thank you

Decline reason:

You are blocked for violating WP:SOCK. You seem to be stating that you were indeed violating WP:SOCK, as you were taking specific advice from other editors. There are no grounds here to consider the block invalid. Yamla (talk) 10:25, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: I haven't violated WP:SOCK as I use only this account. I don't have any other account. This is my one and only account. There must be a confusion. So I request to check again. After I was regarded as a checekuser with the other id's, i followed up all the other mention id's and I notice the following things:-

1. My editing pattern(TryingToDo)- At first I used to edit article directly as I didn't knew rules and for this many of my article got deleted. But after knowing the rules and process of AFC i started creating through AFC process. I had created 12 article through afc. And I pass my article through AFC process only when I finish writing the whole article.

2. DasSoumik- This user write all the article directly and do not follow the process AFC for creating article. And usually The user do not finish writing up any article and generally create article as redirect.

3. GoyalAlokesh- This user generally write about actor and contribute to wikipedia with a gap of many days. And this user write mostly about BLP.

4. Amar Bangladesh Official- This user generally create redirect article.

5. Mysuperradishfinger- This user hasn't contributed in wikipedia.

6. Alokechatterjee3- This user hasn't created any article except Draft:Annwesha Hazra.

7. Mynameisparitoshmandal- This user has only created the article of Annwesha Hazra and also he has accepted that he does paid edit.

8. Alokchatterjee- This user has done very few edits and even the edit which the user has done was not valid and that's why senior editor reverted the user's ​changes.

9. Myselfalok- This user has done 5 edit count and the edit was not valid so senior editor has also reverted this user's edit.

As per as my observation, i have observe that my editing pattern is totaly different from the above mentioned user. And the type of edit i do they do not do the same.

P:S- Among the above mention user i only create article through AFC process. So i would request to admin to look after this matter. Thanks in advance. Bengal Boy (talk) 11:57, 27 May 2021

TryingToDo, you posted the above reply to Yamla in the unblock review template. That should only contain your unblock request and the administrator's review. I moved your reply out of the unblock request box, and did some minimal format changes. --bonadea contributions talk 08:10, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Bonadea thank you. And please help me regarding this. Bengal Boy (talk) 08:47, 2 June 2021

Please Help

Titodutta, hi dada i am from kolkata. And I started editing wikipedia after speaking with some bengali wikipedians. Previously I used to edit anonymously and after talking with some bengali wikipedians(they are experienced and they are editing wikipedia since long years some are writing on bengali language, some english language and some are adding photos on wikimedia) they suggested me to register an account. And I registered an account and started editing by taking their advise and I also participated a bengali wikiproject and I was one of the winners. And om 25 may I also had attended a zoom survey for wikipedia. After the bengali project I started editing in english wikipedia and here also I took help of my seniors who told me to start editing by registering an account. Now recently I added tags(Advert, COI) on an article name Annwesha Hazra. I added advert tag because the article was written like an advertisement. And I added COI tag because the editor who has created the article he/she has created the article in my multiple name. After that I was deleted for a checkuser. And I am not sure why they had selected me as a checkuser. As I started editing my editing journey by taking advice from my senior editor and I and now recently editing only through afc process. Today morning I had asked my senior editors about this and they told me to explain everything on my talk page by mentioning you. Now I dont know why I am selected as a checkuser. Please help me regarding this. Thank you Bengal Boy (talk) 04:54, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohammed Moquim has been accepted

Mohammed Moquim, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheWikiholic (talk) 05:10, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bikash Roychoudhury has been accepted

Bikash Roychoudhury, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheWikiholic (talk) 05:15, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Help My Created Article

Hello Titodutta, Liz, Yamla, JGHowes, Alison, AmandaNP, BDD, DGG, Materialscientist i am mentioning you guys because my created article is tagged as UPE And as you guys can see I was regarded as a sockpuppet. I have already explained everything on my talkpage with proper reason that I have no connection with those id. My only fault is that I regarded that id's who has COI on actress Annwesha Hazra and if you will see their id you will clearly see they has COI on Annwesha Hazra. And for that they has regarded my id as a sockpuppet. But i am saying the truth that I don't have connection with those id. And I am trying to prove myself that I have no connection with those id's but no one is replying me on my talk page. And now they have tagged my created article as UPE. My senior from whom I took advices all of them know that I am not a sockpuppet and I don't take money for creation of article. And I am also telling that I have no id except that and I don't take money and I don't edit on anyone's request. I have started editing when Pinakpani told me that I should register myself on wikipedia and then only i should edit. So had started editing by taking advice of pinakpani. After that through bengali project Naribad i met my senior editor Sumita di, Sujata di, Suvendu da, and I started talking advice from them. But now I am regarded as a sockpuppet without doing a single crime. So I am feeling demotivated right now. I don't know what should I do. But I think you should take a step for this. As I am a member of bengali wikipedian community. I wrote every article cause I like to contribute on wikipedia. And I don't take money and I don't have COI on a single subject. Now my created article is tagged as UPE. I don't have problem if those article get deleted cause I am not working for money and I don't have COI. So I don't have problem. But problem is that I am feeling like a criminal without doing anything. I was editing cause I love to edit. Now it is on your hand what you will do. Thank you. Bengal Boy (talk) 07:56, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

AgniShikha moved to draftspace

Please see log comments. MrsSnoozyTurtle 03:25, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

Hi Titodutta, Liz, Yamla, JGHowes, Alison, AmandaNP, BDD, DGG, Materialscientist, L235 As I am not a checkuser still an editor regarded me as a checkuser. And I have explained my reason but I didn't get a single reply from last 14 days. So my open challenge for you guys. If you can prove I am a checkuser. Then I'll do what ever you will say. I am ready to give every single prove what you need. Now all is up to you. Let's start and prove that your checkuser tool is 100% right. I'll prove that I'm 100% right. If you prove I'll do whatever you will say. Thank you. Bengal Boy (talk) 09:29, 10 June 2021 Bengal Boy (talk) 09:30, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Stop pinging me. If you wish to make another unblock request, WP:GAB explains how, but don't ping me again. You'll need to address your earlier claim that you were taking advice about your edits from other users. --Yamla (talk) 10:12, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Yamla here [1] you declined my appeal that is why I pinged you and yes I took advise from my senior editor who used to edit in bengali language as I am new so I was not able to take advice from english language editors. Bengal Boy (talk) 10:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

STOP PINGING ME. You will not get another warning. --Yamla (talk) 10:45, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

TryingToDo, the CheckUser tool is certainly not "100% right", but it's right enough for our purposes on Wikipedia. I'm more than certain enough of my conclusions from this tool to stand by my block wholeheartedly, and I'm confident that any CU who looks into the matter will agree with me (CUs: see cuwiki if you want to skip the work). Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 02:57, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Also, I recommend that if a further unblock request is unsuccessful, that this user's tpa be revoked at the same time. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 02:57, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Season's Greetings (film)

Hello, TryingToDo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Season's Greetings (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Sree Krishna Bhakto Meera

Hello, TryingToDo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sree Krishna Bhakto Meera, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Season's Greetings (film)

Hello, TryingToDo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Season's Greetings".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC)