Toasterlyreasons

Article Topic

Hey just wanted to let you know that our topic is protoglobalization. We will need to meet to discuss how we will divide the article into sections- I like the points you made (which I pasted below):

• Overview of the "state of the world" in 1600 (leading to a 'world system'

starting to develop that century) maybe the technological, social, economic statuses of the main countries, china, middle east, europe?

• Travel and Trade between countries (merchants etc)

trade routes, standards of currency, 'world economy'

• Treaties, agreements, government-communication between nations

hostilities...imperialism....wars...stuff.

Let's meet on Wednesday at class and discuss it more thoroughly. Accgail (talk) 18:19, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Good start but more work needed

Re: [1]. Good start, but you need to add more references (each para and preferably each sentence should have them). Also, you need wikilinks (see WP:BTW). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 17:57, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

For now, "World Events and Changes Leading to Proto-Globalization" will do. The first para needs citations, and it is not that clear how it is tied into the newly titled section. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 21:27, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

I actually have a similar way of writing, so I can understand how you work. But on Wikipedia, it is a good idea to reference info as quick as possible, as WP:V policy supports removal of unreferenced content (hence if I add unreferenced content to Wikipedia, in my writing of an article here, I try to reference it on the same day). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 21:53, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

editing while not logged in

Yes, provided you can show me which edits were yours. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 02:28, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Nominating Proto-globalization for GAN

Please note your nomination is not complete. You need to add a template to Proto-globalization talk page. See "how-to" at WP:GAN for details. You can see the proper nomination template at Talk:Polyethnicity (for example). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 17:27, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Just add it at the very top of the page. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 17:38, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

You found it now, that's what counts. Good job, --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:02, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

November 2009

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Existentialism. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also useful when reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 16:43, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

re:proto-globalization

I'd suggest both: if you can, rewrite/refocus your section (please note you can move existing content to other articles for extra credit, if it is related to them and referenced, so your effort to date is certainly not wasted) and also if you can help improve other sections of the article, that's certainly is a good thing to do. PS. Regarding "no original research", I think you are fine, but do see WP:OR. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 07:12, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pegi Young may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '''Pegi Morton Young'''; born 1952) is an American singer-songwriter, [[environmentalist]], [[educator]] and [[philanthropist]]. She

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Rick Smolan

Looking over the page, I noticed that the section outlining his works appears to be largely copied from this biography page. It didn't seem to really add a lot to the article anyway, so I just removed it. --Azure Anteater (talk) 06:28, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

• That's fine. I'll leave the article alone and let you to it. --Azure Anteater (talk) 06:32, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rick Smolan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Geographic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Florian Brody, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Springer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Toasterlyreasons. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Toasterlyreasons. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Marc Lesser

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Marc Lesser, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ... discospinster _talk 15:56, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Toasterlyreasons (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am unsure why a moderator has accused me of abusing multiple accounts. I have had this Wikipedia account for 11 years. I was just accused of being another account for user:Fbrody. I created and worked on the page Florian Brody which may be the source of the confusion. I recently attempted to create new page Marc Lesser. I know that user:Fbrody attempted to create a page for Marc Lesser a while ago and it was deleted and I guess had several tags and blocks placed if anyone tried to create a new page with the same name. I was not involved in the original page creation. I worked up a new page for Marc Lesser and attempted to post it but it was deleted, and I was blocked. I have created several pages for Wikipedia over the years and this is very upsetting.

Decline reason:

You appear to be deliberately skirting around your actual relationship with User:Fbrody, who has specifically stated that you worked with him on his autobiography and that he asked you to create the Mark Lesser article. We regard this as a form of abuse of multiple accounts. Yunshui ^雲_水 23:36, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Toasterlyreasons (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I apologize if it seemed like I was trying to mislead anyone; I was simply trying to be concise. Several years ago I was put in touch with Florian Brody ( Fbrody ) by a co-worker in a start-up company I worked for. As someone with some experience creating Wikipedia articles, a recent degree in Nonfiction Writing & looking to gain a wider breadth on online writing experience, I offered to create an article for him as he seemed to meet notability guidelines. We communicated a little via email but I never met him & do not have any sort of personal or business relationship with him. Since that time I have created several other articles, including one for Pegi Young that seems to have held up well even with the publicity of her recent divorce from Neil Young & more recent death. A month ago Fbrody contacted me & asked if I might be interested in creating an article for a colleague of his, Marc Lesser, who is the co-founder of Search Inside Yourself Leadership Institute. He said he had attempted to create an article himself but it was deleted. I researched Marc Lesser and thought there were a decent amount of sources online to justify notability, so I created my own page for him, which was deleted, and then I was accused of sock puppetry and blocked. I am still unclear of how this is “sock puppetry” or “meat puppetry”. The page for meat puppetry states that it involves soliciting another editor to gain support in a dispute. Would the “dispute” be the deleted article Fbrody created for Marc Lesser? I was not trying to take sides in his deleted article; I created my own, entirely separate article, based on what I perceived to be at least moderately decent sources to support the content. The article creation was my own independent decision and my own work. I did not get involved in the dispute over Fbrody's original article for Marc Lesser. I understand that sock puppetry is a serious issue, but I don’t believe it should apply to the creation of valid articles. If you believe the issue is the creation of the Marc Lesser article then fine, I will not attempt to post or otherwise be involved with that article. But I'm not sure why this means I should be punished with an indefinite block from ever posting on Wikipedia with this account ever again, which I have used to create several articles that have had no issues. Thank you.

Accept reason:

Thank you for being upfront. It would be worth your while reading up on Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy if you have not already done so, but I see no reason to keep this block in place any more, and am therefore lifting it. Yunshui ^雲_水 22:33, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

And, since no-one else thought to notify you properly:

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Yunshui ^雲_水 00:04, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)